Introduction Multiple daily injections (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) are two modalities of treating type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The benefits of CSII on long-term metabolic control and outcomes compared to those of MDI are still debated. We investigated both vascular function and myocardial performance in T1DM adolescents on MDI or CSII treatment. Methods One hundred twenty-three T1DM subjects (mean age 14.16±2.55 years), 63 on MDI regimen, 60 on CSII, and 57 controls were enrolled. Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics were evaluated. Ultrasound assessments of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), flow-mediated dilatation of brachial artery, anteroposterior diameter of the infrarenal abdominal aorta (APAO), and transthoracic echocardiography were performed. Results T1DM subjects on the CSII regimen showed better glycemic control than those on MDI, expressed as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). c-IMT and APAO were higher in MDI than CSII patients (0.61±0.11 mm vs. 0.56±0.07 mm, p=0.04; 13.61±3.29 mm vs. 11.65±1.84 mm, p=0.01, respectively). Left and right Tei index and left E/e' ratio were higher in MDI than CSII subjects (0.82±0.40 vs. 0.52±0.19, p=0.002; 0.86±0.41 vs. 0.64±0.1, p=0.02; 5.89±2.0 vs. 4.73±1.59, p=0.02, respectively). Multiple regression analyses showed that glucose level, HbA1c and diabetes onset were significantly related to vascular and echocardiographic parameters in MDI and CSII patients. Conclusions CSII regimen in T1DM adolescents improves glycemic control and seems to ameliorate endothelial function and global myocardial performance as compared to MDI therapy.
Vascular and Myocardial Function in Young People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Multiple Daily Injections Insulin Regimen
Faienza M. F.;Scicchitano P.;Lamparelli R.;Zaza P.;Cecere A.;Brunetti G.;Cortese F.;Valente F.;Delvecchio M.;Giordano P.;Ciccone M. M.
2021-01-01
Abstract
Introduction Multiple daily injections (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) are two modalities of treating type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The benefits of CSII on long-term metabolic control and outcomes compared to those of MDI are still debated. We investigated both vascular function and myocardial performance in T1DM adolescents on MDI or CSII treatment. Methods One hundred twenty-three T1DM subjects (mean age 14.16±2.55 years), 63 on MDI regimen, 60 on CSII, and 57 controls were enrolled. Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics were evaluated. Ultrasound assessments of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), flow-mediated dilatation of brachial artery, anteroposterior diameter of the infrarenal abdominal aorta (APAO), and transthoracic echocardiography were performed. Results T1DM subjects on the CSII regimen showed better glycemic control than those on MDI, expressed as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). c-IMT and APAO were higher in MDI than CSII patients (0.61±0.11 mm vs. 0.56±0.07 mm, p=0.04; 13.61±3.29 mm vs. 11.65±1.84 mm, p=0.01, respectively). Left and right Tei index and left E/e' ratio were higher in MDI than CSII subjects (0.82±0.40 vs. 0.52±0.19, p=0.002; 0.86±0.41 vs. 0.64±0.1, p=0.02; 5.89±2.0 vs. 4.73±1.59, p=0.02, respectively). Multiple regression analyses showed that glucose level, HbA1c and diabetes onset were significantly related to vascular and echocardiographic parameters in MDI and CSII patients. Conclusions CSII regimen in T1DM adolescents improves glycemic control and seems to ameliorate endothelial function and global myocardial performance as compared to MDI therapy.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
