This case note comments on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 1 August 2025 (Joined Cases C-71/23 P and C-82/23 P, France and Commission v CWS), which upheld the annulment of the classification of titanium dioxide as a category 2 carcinogen by inhalation under the CLP Regulation. It reconstructs the European regulatory framework, distinguishing classification from the ban on titanium dioxide as a food additive (E171) and from the rules on cosmetics, and compares selected non-European jurisdictions. It argues that risk regulation entails value choices, whose legitimacy requires transparent and participatory decision-making.

La genotossicità del biossido di titanio tra risk assessment e precauzione

Enrico BUONO
2025-01-01

Abstract

This case note comments on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 1 August 2025 (Joined Cases C-71/23 P and C-82/23 P, France and Commission v CWS), which upheld the annulment of the classification of titanium dioxide as a category 2 carcinogen by inhalation under the CLP Regulation. It reconstructs the European regulatory framework, distinguishing classification from the ban on titanium dioxide as a food additive (E171) and from the rules on cosmetics, and compares selected non-European jurisdictions. It argues that risk regulation entails value choices, whose legitimacy requires transparent and participatory decision-making.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/598906
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact