This article examines, from an Italian–Spanish contrastive perspective, the translation of stereotyped comparative phraseological units, i.e. constructions such as It. dormire come un ghiro, Sp. dormir como un lirón, or It. essere come cane e gatto, Sp. ser/estar como el perro y el gato, which convey a unitary semantic value through syntactic structures crystallised by repeated usage and sanctioned by the phraseological norms of the respective languages. Building on the theoretical distinction between phrasemes and complex lexical collocations, several typologies of these two phraseological categories are presented, and the degree of interlinguistic equivalence exhibited by these units in Italian and Spanish through a systematic comparison of monolingual and bilingual lexicographic sources and contemporary usage corpora. The analysis shows that, alongside a minority of cases displaying total formal and lexical coincidence, cases of partial coincidence—characterised by semantic and structural correspondence without lexical coincidence in the comparative term—or complete non-coincidence clearly predominate. These findings highlight the need for translators and foreign-language teachers to pay systematic attention to strategies of semantic compensation, to the prior paraphrastic explication of phraseological meaning, and to the systematic consultation of authentic usage corpora, rather than relying on literal or calque-based translation

Traducir la comparación: entre locuciones y colocaciones léxicas complejas en italiano y en español

greco, simone
In corso di stampa

Abstract

This article examines, from an Italian–Spanish contrastive perspective, the translation of stereotyped comparative phraseological units, i.e. constructions such as It. dormire come un ghiro, Sp. dormir como un lirón, or It. essere come cane e gatto, Sp. ser/estar como el perro y el gato, which convey a unitary semantic value through syntactic structures crystallised by repeated usage and sanctioned by the phraseological norms of the respective languages. Building on the theoretical distinction between phrasemes and complex lexical collocations, several typologies of these two phraseological categories are presented, and the degree of interlinguistic equivalence exhibited by these units in Italian and Spanish through a systematic comparison of monolingual and bilingual lexicographic sources and contemporary usage corpora. The analysis shows that, alongside a minority of cases displaying total formal and lexical coincidence, cases of partial coincidence—characterised by semantic and structural correspondence without lexical coincidence in the comparative term—or complete non-coincidence clearly predominate. These findings highlight the need for translators and foreign-language teachers to pay systematic attention to strategies of semantic compensation, to the prior paraphrastic explication of phraseological meaning, and to the systematic consultation of authentic usage corpora, rather than relying on literal or calque-based translation
In corso di stampa
El presente artículo aborda, desde una perspectiva contrastiva italiano-español, el tratamiento traductológico de las unidades fraseológicas comparativas estereotipadas, es decir, aquellas construcciones del tipo it. dormire come un ghiro, es. dormir como un lirón o it. essere come cane e gatto, es. ser / estar como el perro y el gato que expresan un valor semántico unitario a través de una estructura sintáctica cristalizada por el uso. Partiendo de la distinción teórica entre locución y colocación léxica compleja, se propone estudiar algunas tipologías de ambas categorías fraseológicas y se examina, mediante el cotejo de fuentes lexicográficas monolingües y bilingües y de corpus electrónicos, el grado de equivalencia interlingüística que estas unidades presentan en los dos idiomas. El análisis muestra que, junto a un núcleo minoritario de casos de coincidencia total en la forma y en los componentes léxicos, predominan ampliamente los casos de coincidencia parcial —coincidencia semántico-estructural sin coincidencia del término de comparación— o de no coincidencia plena, lo que exige del traductor y del docente de lenguas extranjeras una atención sistemática a los procedimientos de compensación semántica, a la explicitación parafrástica previa del contenido idiomático y a la consulta metódica de corpus de uso real, en detrimento de la traducción literal o por calco.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/598369
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact