Maoist sport promoted sport ethics based on the elimination of hostile or aggressive feelings towards the opponent. The Chinese policy of ‘friendship first, competition second’ impressed Westerners, who were more inclined to agonism. Chinese sport ethics taught that you win even when you are defeated; this left foreign competitors in a state of emotional disorientation. During the 1974 Asian Games in Tehran, the defeated Chinese athletes all looked amused; they were the tangible representation of the motto ‘the important thing is to take part’. The exaltation of strength could have distracted the Chinese people from the ideal of collectivism, which is intellectual culture. The importance of sport would have encouraged the emergence of the cult of the champion, hence the superiority of one over others. This approach was intended by Maoism as a form of social pedagogy: discouraging competitive behaviour meant opposing liberalism, social Darwinism; China was educating the strong to help the weak, the rich to help the poor

The Body in Maoist Ideology as a Form of Social-Relational Communication

Gabriella de mita
2024-01-01

Abstract

Maoist sport promoted sport ethics based on the elimination of hostile or aggressive feelings towards the opponent. The Chinese policy of ‘friendship first, competition second’ impressed Westerners, who were more inclined to agonism. Chinese sport ethics taught that you win even when you are defeated; this left foreign competitors in a state of emotional disorientation. During the 1974 Asian Games in Tehran, the defeated Chinese athletes all looked amused; they were the tangible representation of the motto ‘the important thing is to take part’. The exaltation of strength could have distracted the Chinese people from the ideal of collectivism, which is intellectual culture. The importance of sport would have encouraged the emergence of the cult of the champion, hence the superiority of one over others. This approach was intended by Maoism as a form of social pedagogy: discouraging competitive behaviour meant opposing liberalism, social Darwinism; China was educating the strong to help the weak, the rich to help the poor
2024
978-88-6479-283-5
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/520384
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact