In this article we present a classification system for an automatic detection of masses in digitized mammographic images. The system consists in three main processing levels: a) image segmentation for the localization of regions of interest (ROIs); b) ROI characterization by means of textural features computed from the Gray Tone Spatial Dependence Matrix (GTSDM), containing second order spatial statistics information on the pixel grey level intensity; c) ROI classification by means of a neural network, with supervision provided by the radiologist's diagnosis. The CAD system was developed and evaluated using a database of NI = 3369 mammographic images: the breakdown ofthe cases was NIn = 2307 negative images, and N Ip = 1062 pathological (or positive) images, containing at least one confirmed mass, as diagnosed by an expert radiologist. To examine the performance of the overall CAD system, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC (FROC) analysis were employed. The area under the ROC curve was found to be Az = 0.78 ± 0.008 for ROI-based classification. When evaluating the accuracy of the CAD against the radiologist-drawn boundaries, 4.23 false positive per image (FPpI) are found at 80% mass sensitivity. © 2007 Taylor & Francis Group.
Mass lesion detection in mammographic images using Haralik textural features
S. Tangaro;F. De Carlo;G. Gargano;R. Bellotti;
2007-01-01
Abstract
In this article we present a classification system for an automatic detection of masses in digitized mammographic images. The system consists in three main processing levels: a) image segmentation for the localization of regions of interest (ROIs); b) ROI characterization by means of textural features computed from the Gray Tone Spatial Dependence Matrix (GTSDM), containing second order spatial statistics information on the pixel grey level intensity; c) ROI classification by means of a neural network, with supervision provided by the radiologist's diagnosis. The CAD system was developed and evaluated using a database of NI = 3369 mammographic images: the breakdown ofthe cases was NIn = 2307 negative images, and N Ip = 1062 pathological (or positive) images, containing at least one confirmed mass, as diagnosed by an expert radiologist. To examine the performance of the overall CAD system, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC (FROC) analysis were employed. The area under the ROC curve was found to be Az = 0.78 ± 0.008 for ROI-based classification. When evaluating the accuracy of the CAD against the radiologist-drawn boundaries, 4.23 false positive per image (FPpI) are found at 80% mass sensitivity. © 2007 Taylor & Francis Group.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.