Although the biophysical effects of afforestation or deforestation on local climate are recognized, the biophysical consequences of seasonal and long-term dynamics in forests on understory microclimate, which creates microrefugia for forest organisms under global warming, remain less well understood. To fill this research gap, we combined a three-layered (i.e., canopy, forest air space and understory soil) land surface energy balance model and Intrinsic Biophysical Mechanism Model and quantify seasonal (warm minus cool seasons) and long-term changes (later minus former periods) in the biophysical effects of forest dynamics on understory air temperature (ΔT a) and soil surface temperature (ΔT s). We found that high latitudes forests show strongest negative seasonal variations in both ΔT a and ΔT s, followed by moderate latitudes forests. In contrast, low latitudes forests exhibit positive seasonal variations in ΔT a and weak negative seasonal variations in ΔT s. For the long-term variations, ΔT s increases systematically at all three latitudes. However, the situation differs greatly for ΔT s, with a weak increase at low and moderate latitudes, but a slight decrease at high latitudes. Overall, changes in sensible and latent heat fluxes induced by forest dynamics (such as leaf area index), by altering the aerodynamic resistances of canopy and soil surface layers, are the main factors driving changes in forest microclimate effects. In addition, this study also develops an aerodynamic resistance coefficient fr1 to combine the air temperature effects and surface soil temperature effects and proposes an indicator – ΔT Su, that is, ΔTSu=ΔTs+(1fr1−1)ΔTa , as a possible benchmark for evaluating the total biophysical effects of forests on temperatures.

Seasonal and long-term dynamics in forest microclimate effects: global pattern and mechanism

Lafortezza R.
Supervision
2023-01-01

Abstract

Although the biophysical effects of afforestation or deforestation on local climate are recognized, the biophysical consequences of seasonal and long-term dynamics in forests on understory microclimate, which creates microrefugia for forest organisms under global warming, remain less well understood. To fill this research gap, we combined a three-layered (i.e., canopy, forest air space and understory soil) land surface energy balance model and Intrinsic Biophysical Mechanism Model and quantify seasonal (warm minus cool seasons) and long-term changes (later minus former periods) in the biophysical effects of forest dynamics on understory air temperature (ΔT a) and soil surface temperature (ΔT s). We found that high latitudes forests show strongest negative seasonal variations in both ΔT a and ΔT s, followed by moderate latitudes forests. In contrast, low latitudes forests exhibit positive seasonal variations in ΔT a and weak negative seasonal variations in ΔT s. For the long-term variations, ΔT s increases systematically at all three latitudes. However, the situation differs greatly for ΔT s, with a weak increase at low and moderate latitudes, but a slight decrease at high latitudes. Overall, changes in sensible and latent heat fluxes induced by forest dynamics (such as leaf area index), by altering the aerodynamic resistances of canopy and soil surface layers, are the main factors driving changes in forest microclimate effects. In addition, this study also develops an aerodynamic resistance coefficient fr1 to combine the air temperature effects and surface soil temperature effects and proposes an indicator – ΔT Su, that is, ΔTSu=ΔTs+(1fr1−1)ΔTa , as a possible benchmark for evaluating the total biophysical effects of forests on temperatures.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41612-023-00442-y.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.54 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/470081
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact