The author describes the mutual observation processes that take place between cinema and law. Cinema has represented the law in many of its aspects, it has played a role in guiding public opinion regarding the law, it has contributed to denouncing situations of discrimination and violation of rights. On the other hand, the law has mainly performed a function of normalizing cinematographic works, using both its coercive tools and its incentive tools. The last part of the work describes what has changed in this relationship in the streaming era.

Cinema e diritto: un confronto impossibile?

Luigi Pannarale
2023-01-01

Abstract

The author describes the mutual observation processes that take place between cinema and law. Cinema has represented the law in many of its aspects, it has played a role in guiding public opinion regarding the law, it has contributed to denouncing situations of discrimination and violation of rights. On the other hand, the law has mainly performed a function of normalizing cinematographic works, using both its coercive tools and its incentive tools. The last part of the work describes what has changed in this relationship in the streaming era.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/455048
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact