We discuss three control strategies aimed at countering the effects of decoherence: the first hinges on frequent projective measurements, the second on frequent unitary "kicks" ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third on a strong continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/kicks is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong: in all these cases, the Hilbert space of the system splits into invariant subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. However, if N or K are large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.

Control of decoherence

Pascazio S;FACCHI, PAOLO
2005-01-01

Abstract

We discuss three control strategies aimed at countering the effects of decoherence: the first hinges on frequent projective measurements, the second on frequent unitary "kicks" ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third on a strong continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/kicks is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong: in all these cases, the Hilbert space of the system splits into invariant subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. However, if N or K are large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/29901
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact