We discuss three control strategies aimed at countering the effects of decoherence: the first hinges on frequent projective measurements, the second on frequent unitary "kicks" ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third on a strong continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/kicks is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong: in all these cases, the Hilbert space of the system splits into invariant subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. However, if N or K are large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.
Control of decoherence
Pascazio S;FACCHI, PAOLO
2005-01-01
Abstract
We discuss three control strategies aimed at countering the effects of decoherence: the first hinges on frequent projective measurements, the second on frequent unitary "kicks" ("bang-bang" pulses) and the third on a strong continuous coupling. Decoherence is suppressed if the frequency N of the measurements/kicks is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong: in all these cases, the Hilbert space of the system splits into invariant subspaces, among which any transition is hindered. However, if N or K are large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.