The effect of rootstock on scion photosynthesis can be quite marked. Reduced hydraulic conductivity at the graft union can negatively affect stomata conductance, which in turn may diminish gas exchanges and photosynthesis. Under high light intensities this condition can worsen, as a proportionally smaller fraction of intercepted photons can be utilized in the photosynthetic process. The excess photons are dissipated either via photoprotective mechanisms (Non-Photochemical-Quenching; Alternative Transports; Photorespiration), or photooxidation, with the production of Active Oxygen Species (AOS). Under reduced photosynthetic activity, the defense mechanisms and photooxidation reactions increase, to cope with excess energy which cannot be utilized for carboxylation. This paper reports a study conducted on leaves of the pear ‘Bosc’ grafted on seedling and quince EMC rootstocks, detailing their behavior under conditions of same light and temperature. Stomata conductance and transpiration were consistently higher in the trees on seedling than on EMC, which resulted in greater photosynthetic activity in the leaves of the former. Because of the stomata limitation, trees on EMC allocated less energy to the photosynthetic process, as a greater proportion of intercepted photons was dissipated via the Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) cycle and leaded the Photosystem II (PSII) damage. Somewhat surprisingly Alternative Transports (Water-Water Cycle; Cyclic Transport around PSI; Glutathione-Ascorbate Cycle) and Photorespiration in quince was consistently lower than in seedling-grafted trees during the first measurement. In conclusion, rootstocks can affect the photosynthetic potential of the grafted tree, in relation to their graft compatibility, although more work is needed to understand the degree of reduction due to photo-oxidative stress.

Effects of rootstock on pear photosynthetic efficiency

LOSCIALE, PASQUALE;
2008-01-01

Abstract

The effect of rootstock on scion photosynthesis can be quite marked. Reduced hydraulic conductivity at the graft union can negatively affect stomata conductance, which in turn may diminish gas exchanges and photosynthesis. Under high light intensities this condition can worsen, as a proportionally smaller fraction of intercepted photons can be utilized in the photosynthetic process. The excess photons are dissipated either via photoprotective mechanisms (Non-Photochemical-Quenching; Alternative Transports; Photorespiration), or photooxidation, with the production of Active Oxygen Species (AOS). Under reduced photosynthetic activity, the defense mechanisms and photooxidation reactions increase, to cope with excess energy which cannot be utilized for carboxylation. This paper reports a study conducted on leaves of the pear ‘Bosc’ grafted on seedling and quince EMC rootstocks, detailing their behavior under conditions of same light and temperature. Stomata conductance and transpiration were consistently higher in the trees on seedling than on EMC, which resulted in greater photosynthetic activity in the leaves of the former. Because of the stomata limitation, trees on EMC allocated less energy to the photosynthetic process, as a greater proportion of intercepted photons was dissipated via the Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) cycle and leaded the Photosystem II (PSII) damage. Somewhat surprisingly Alternative Transports (Water-Water Cycle; Cyclic Transport around PSI; Glutathione-Ascorbate Cycle) and Photorespiration in quince was consistently lower than in seedling-grafted trees during the first measurement. In conclusion, rootstocks can affect the photosynthetic potential of the grafted tree, in relation to their graft compatibility, although more work is needed to understand the degree of reduction due to photo-oxidative stress.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/239309
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact