Metabolic profiles of 32 Negroamaro red wines were analysed using 1H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analyses (Principal Component Analysis, PCA, and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis, OPLS-DA). Among winemaking technologies three were compared: ultrasounds (U; 12 samples), cryomaceration using dry ice (C; 12 samples) and traditional (T; 8 samples). Moreover, each vinification technology was used for grapes grown by two different soil management practices, soil tillage (ST; 16 samples) and cover crop (CC; 16 samples), and by two different training systems, monolateral (M; 16 samples) and bilateral Guyot (B; 16 samples). All statistical models applied on NMR data revealed a good separation between ST (soil tillage) and CC (cover crop), showing a higher influence of the soil management practices compared to the winemaking technologies (ultrasound, cryomaceration and traditional). The differentiation among samples, due to soil management practices, was mainly caused by metabolites such as glycerol, 2,3-butanediol, malic acid, a/b-glucose and phenolic compounds, such as tyrosine and caffeic acid.

Viticultural practice and winemaking effects on metabolic profile of Negroamaro

DE PASCALI, SANDRA ANGELICA;DEL COCO, LAURA;BASILE, TEODORA;GAMBACORTA, Giuseppe;FANIZZI, Francesco Paolo
2014-01-01

Abstract

Metabolic profiles of 32 Negroamaro red wines were analysed using 1H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analyses (Principal Component Analysis, PCA, and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis, OPLS-DA). Among winemaking technologies three were compared: ultrasounds (U; 12 samples), cryomaceration using dry ice (C; 12 samples) and traditional (T; 8 samples). Moreover, each vinification technology was used for grapes grown by two different soil management practices, soil tillage (ST; 16 samples) and cover crop (CC; 16 samples), and by two different training systems, monolateral (M; 16 samples) and bilateral Guyot (B; 16 samples). All statistical models applied on NMR data revealed a good separation between ST (soil tillage) and CC (cover crop), showing a higher influence of the soil management practices compared to the winemaking technologies (ultrasound, cryomaceration and traditional). The differentiation among samples, due to soil management practices, was mainly caused by metabolites such as glycerol, 2,3-butanediol, malic acid, a/b-glucose and phenolic compounds, such as tyrosine and caffeic acid.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/109452
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact