OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of bicalutamide monotherapy to maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with histologically proven stage C or D (American Urological Association Staging System) disease were randomly allocated to either bicalutamide (B) or goserelin plus flutamide (G+F). After disease progression, patients treated with B were assigned to castration. The primary endpoint for this trial was overall survival. Prostate cancer-specific survival and progression were included among secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In total 108 patients received B and 112 received G+F. At a median follow-up time of 54 months (range 1-89), 151 patients progressed and 113 died. There was no significant difference in the duration of either progression-free or overall survival. Hazards of progression, death and cancer-specific death, corrected by disease stage, tumor grade and baseline PSA level, showed that patients initially assigned to B had a higher risk of progression but a comparable risk of death and cancer-specific death with the exception of patients with G3 tumors who had an increased risk of death). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with well or moderately well differentiated tumors, B monotherapy followed by castration may offer the same survival chance as maximal androgen deprivation. In those patients it thus represents a reasonable choice that can avoid the side effects of androgen deprivation for considerable periods of time.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
|Titolo:||Bicalutamide monotherapy versus flutamide plus goserelin in prostate cancer: Updated results of a multicentric trial|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2002|
|Citazione:||Bicalutamide monotherapy versus flutamide plus goserelin in prostate cancer: Updated results of a multicentric trial / Boccardo F; Barichello M; Battaglia M; Carmignani G; Comeri G; Ferraris V; Lilliu S; Montefiore F; Portoghese F; Cortellini P; Rigatti P; Usai E; Rubagotti A. - In: EUROPEAN UROLOGY. - ISSN 0302-2838. - 42:5(2002), pp. 481-489.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|