This work examines some possible implications of the the judgment n. 88/14 with that the Constitutional Court ruled on the enforcement provisions of the so-called “principle of a balanced budget” (law n. 243/12), examining, specifically, some issues proposed by the Region of Friuli Venezia Giulia and the Autonomous Province of Trento about the bonds of debt and use of balances which are subject to management autonomy, as well as collaboration tools between State and Regions under the law in question. However we tried to highlight, considering the result reached by the Court (of partial acceptance of some of the questions raised), the possible arising of some critical issues that may occur in the application of Law n. 243/12, about the normal relationships between State and Regions
La Corte accoglie solo parzialmente alcune istanze regionaliste, ma conferma, nella sostanza, la disciplina di attuazione del principio di equilibrio dei bilanci pubblici (note a margine della sentenza Corte cost. n. 88/2014)
GRIMALDI, LUCA
2014-01-01
Abstract
This work examines some possible implications of the the judgment n. 88/14 with that the Constitutional Court ruled on the enforcement provisions of the so-called “principle of a balanced budget” (law n. 243/12), examining, specifically, some issues proposed by the Region of Friuli Venezia Giulia and the Autonomous Province of Trento about the bonds of debt and use of balances which are subject to management autonomy, as well as collaboration tools between State and Regions under the law in question. However we tried to highlight, considering the result reached by the Court (of partial acceptance of some of the questions raised), the possible arising of some critical issues that may occur in the application of Law n. 243/12, about the normal relationships between State and RegionsI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
