This study explores how Procopius of Caesarea integrates Herodotean mimesis alongside his traditional Thucydidean framework in the Persian Wars. By analyzing the speeches during the Nika Riots (532 AD) and Khosrow I's allocution at Antioch (540 AD), Eramo demonstrates how Procopius uses literary models, tragic warnings, and intertextual variations to convey implicit political critiques and complex reflections on fate (týche). Classical mimesis serves not as mere stylistic imitation, but as a sophisticated system of masks enabling the historian to guide reader reception and articulate nuanced views on contemporary 6th-century events

Rhetoric and Narrative Settings in Procopius’ Persian Wars: Ten Centuries after Herodotus

I. Eramo
2026-01-01

Abstract

This study explores how Procopius of Caesarea integrates Herodotean mimesis alongside his traditional Thucydidean framework in the Persian Wars. By analyzing the speeches during the Nika Riots (532 AD) and Khosrow I's allocution at Antioch (540 AD), Eramo demonstrates how Procopius uses literary models, tragic warnings, and intertextual variations to convey implicit political critiques and complex reflections on fate (týche). Classical mimesis serves not as mere stylistic imitation, but as a sophisticated system of masks enabling the historian to guide reader reception and articulate nuanced views on contemporary 6th-century events
2026
978-90-04-76760-7
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/596280
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact