Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has diverse clinical presentations and responses to treatment. For systemic corticosteroids in particular, randomised controlled trials have reported conflicting effects, highlighting the need for individualised treatment strategies. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we derived and validated a causal machine learning (ML) framework to estimate individualised corticosteroid treatment effects in IgAN. Eight international cohorts, including the VALIGA, CureGN, and NURTuRE-CKD repositories, comprising 1022 patients, were analysed (derivation, n = 464; validation, n = 558). We integrated baseline clinical data, histopathological classification scores (MEST-C), and deep learning-based histomorphological biomarkers (pathomics) from digitised kidney biopsies. The framework estimated the effect of systemic corticosteroids on the composite endpoint of a ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate or kidney failure within five years of biopsy. Findings: Across the overall study population, systemic corticosteroid therapy was not associated with a significant improvement in the composite outcome (p = 0·27). However, the causal ML framework revealed substantial treatment heterogeneity, identifying patients with high predicted benefit who achieved longer progression-free survival with corticosteroids (0·43 years, 95% CI 0·18–0·73, p < 0·01), while no benefit was observed in those with low predicted benefit (−0·005 years, 95% CI −0·3 to 0·22, p > 0·05). An individualised framework-guided treatment assignment was estimated to reduce systemic corticosteroid use by 60·7%. Pathomics facilitated the identification of interstitial inflammation and tubulitis as key features of corticosteroid response. Interpretation: This study demonstrates that a causal ML framework integrating clinical, histopathological, and pathomics predictors can individualise treatment assignments for systemic corticosteroids in IgAN. This approach provides a blueprint for precision therapy in IgAN, supporting AI-enhanced clinical decision-making in the era of emerging targeted treatments. Funding: German Research Foundation; European Research Council; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee; Clinician Scientist Program of the Faculty of Medicine RWTH Aachen University.
Individualised treatment effects of corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy
Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has diverse clinical presentations and responses to treatment. For systemic corticosteroids in particular, randomised controlled trials have reported conflicting effects, highlighting the need for individualised treatment strategies. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we derived and validated a causal machine learning (ML) framework to estimate individualised corticosteroid treatment effects in IgAN. Eight international cohorts, including the VALIGA, CureGN, and NURTuRE-CKD repositories, comprising 1022 patients, were analysed (derivation, n = 464; validation, n = 558). We integrated baseline clinical data, histopathological classification scores (MEST-C), and deep learning-based histomorphological biomarkers (pathomics) from digitised kidney biopsies. The framework estimated the effect of systemic corticosteroids on the composite endpoint of a ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate or kidney failure within five years of biopsy. Findings: Across the overall study population, systemic corticosteroid therapy was not associated with a significant improvement in the composite outcome (p = 0·27). However, the causal ML framework revealed substantial treatment heterogeneity, identifying patients with high predicted benefit who achieved longer progression-free survival with corticosteroids (0·43 years, 95% CI 0·18–0·73, p < 0·01), while no benefit was observed in those with low predicted benefit (−0·005 years, 95% CI −0·3 to 0·22, p > 0·05). An individualised framework-guided treatment assignment was estimated to reduce systemic corticosteroid use by 60·7%. Pathomics facilitated the identification of interstitial inflammation and tubulitis as key features of corticosteroid response. Interpretation: This study demonstrates that a causal ML framework integrating clinical, histopathological, and pathomics predictors can individualise treatment assignments for systemic corticosteroids in IgAN. This approach provides a blueprint for precision therapy in IgAN, supporting AI-enhanced clinical decision-making in the era of emerging targeted treatments. Funding: German Research Foundation; European Research Council; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee; Clinician Scientist Program of the Faculty of Medicine RWTH Aachen University.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/595642
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
0
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.