Unlabelled: Bispecific antibodies (BiTEs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), offering deep and durable responses even in heavily pretreated patients. However, their use carries substantial infectious risk due to immunosuppression, particularly hypogammaglobulinemia, induced by T-cell-redirecting therapy. To define the real-world incidence of grade 3–4 infections, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies including RRMM patients treated with BiTEs currently approved for clinical use. Ten studies encompassing 1,373 patients were analysed using a random-effects model of pooled proportions. The overall rate of grade 3–4 infections was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.22–0.30) after a median follow-up of 8.3 months, with moderate heterogeneity (I²=52.9%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable pooled event rates for teclistamab—anti-CD3/BCMA—(0.26; 95% CI, 0.22–0.31) and talquetamab—anti-CD3/GPRC5D—(0.23; 95% CI, 0.14–0.33). Meta-regression revealed an inverse association between infection rates and mean number of prior therapy lines (p = 0.002) and prior BCMA exposure (p = 0.0019), likely because, in real world setting, clinicians select fitter, immunologically stable patients for BiTEs therapy. In summary, approximately one in four RRMM patients receiving BiTEs experiences severe infection. These findings underscore the need for proactive monitoring and standardized preventive measures, including immunoglobulin replacement, prophylaxis, vaccination, to ensure safe, effective integration of BiTEs into routine MM care. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00277-026-07026-9.

Real-world incidence of severe infections in multiple myeloma patients receiving bispecific antibodies: a meta-analysis

Spataro F.
Conceptualization
;
Desantis V.;Vacca A.;Ria R.;Solimando A. G.
2026-01-01

Abstract

Unlabelled: Bispecific antibodies (BiTEs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), offering deep and durable responses even in heavily pretreated patients. However, their use carries substantial infectious risk due to immunosuppression, particularly hypogammaglobulinemia, induced by T-cell-redirecting therapy. To define the real-world incidence of grade 3–4 infections, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies including RRMM patients treated with BiTEs currently approved for clinical use. Ten studies encompassing 1,373 patients were analysed using a random-effects model of pooled proportions. The overall rate of grade 3–4 infections was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.22–0.30) after a median follow-up of 8.3 months, with moderate heterogeneity (I²=52.9%). Subgroup analyses showed comparable pooled event rates for teclistamab—anti-CD3/BCMA—(0.26; 95% CI, 0.22–0.31) and talquetamab—anti-CD3/GPRC5D—(0.23; 95% CI, 0.14–0.33). Meta-regression revealed an inverse association between infection rates and mean number of prior therapy lines (p = 0.002) and prior BCMA exposure (p = 0.0019), likely because, in real world setting, clinicians select fitter, immunologically stable patients for BiTEs therapy. In summary, approximately one in four RRMM patients receiving BiTEs experiences severe infection. These findings underscore the need for proactive monitoring and standardized preventive measures, including immunoglobulin replacement, prophylaxis, vaccination, to ensure safe, effective integration of BiTEs into routine MM care. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00277-026-07026-9.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/582461
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact