The category of "artefact"has been analyzed by different semiotic theories and methods. Starting from the Marxian theory of the dialectical relation between production and use (or consumption), Ferruccio Rossi-Landi (1921-1985) maintained the possibility of considering every "artefact"- or use-value - as a crossroads between material and linguistic production, i.e., as a crossroads between labor and language. This paper proposes a comparison - and a dialogue - between Rossi-Landi's materialistic sign-theory and other semiotic approaches. From such a perspective, the concept of "artefact"could be considered as an analytical starting point for the study of further social and economic meaning-making processes.

Artefacts as Signs, Signs as Artefacts

Borrelli, Giorgio
2020-01-01

Abstract

The category of "artefact"has been analyzed by different semiotic theories and methods. Starting from the Marxian theory of the dialectical relation between production and use (or consumption), Ferruccio Rossi-Landi (1921-1985) maintained the possibility of considering every "artefact"- or use-value - as a crossroads between material and linguistic production, i.e., as a crossroads between labor and language. This paper proposes a comparison - and a dialogue - between Rossi-Landi's materialistic sign-theory and other semiotic approaches. From such a perspective, the concept of "artefact"could be considered as an analytical starting point for the study of further social and economic meaning-making processes.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/573041
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact