The category of "artefact"has been analyzed by different semiotic theories and methods. Starting from the Marxian theory of the dialectical relation between production and use (or consumption), Ferruccio Rossi-Landi (1921-1985) maintained the possibility of considering every "artefact"- or use-value - as a crossroads between material and linguistic production, i.e., as a crossroads between labor and language. This paper proposes a comparison - and a dialogue - between Rossi-Landi's materialistic sign-theory and other semiotic approaches. From such a perspective, the concept of "artefact"could be considered as an analytical starting point for the study of further social and economic meaning-making processes.
Artefacts as Signs, Signs as Artefacts
Borrelli, Giorgio
2020-01-01
Abstract
The category of "artefact"has been analyzed by different semiotic theories and methods. Starting from the Marxian theory of the dialectical relation between production and use (or consumption), Ferruccio Rossi-Landi (1921-1985) maintained the possibility of considering every "artefact"- or use-value - as a crossroads between material and linguistic production, i.e., as a crossroads between labor and language. This paper proposes a comparison - and a dialogue - between Rossi-Landi's materialistic sign-theory and other semiotic approaches. From such a perspective, the concept of "artefact"could be considered as an analytical starting point for the study of further social and economic meaning-making processes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


