Bronzini, fascinated by the multifaceted nature of Saint Nicholas and his cult, explores his ability to adapt to culturally diverse and geographically distant contexts, highlighting not only his relationship with the sea—a theme traditionally examined—but also his connection to the land. His analysis, however, is influenced by the position of the Bollandist Delehaye—“the cult determines the hagiography”—a pretext for clarifying his idea of hagiography defined as “the most effective ecclesiastical means of nourishing and expanding the cult.” According to Bronzini, in the case of Saint Nicholas, “in the absence of historical documentation and unambiguous identification of the person—the fusion/confusion of Nicholas of Myra and Nicholas of Sion—his legendary hagiography grows in inverse proportion to his historical hagiography, giving real substance to a symbolic figure.” In reality, the findings of research conducted in recent decades, especially by Gerardo Cioffari, one of the most important scholars of the figure of Saint Nicholas and the spread of his cult throughout the world, have restored historical substance to the figure of the Bishop of Myra, reconstructing important pieces of his history and the origins of his cult.
Bronzini, affascinato dalla poliedricità di San Nicola e del suo culto, ne approfondisce la capacità metamorfica di insediarsi in realtà culturalmente diverse e geograficamente lontane, valorizzando non soltanto il suo rapporto con il mare, tradizionalmente indagato, ma anche quello con la terra. La sua analisi, tuttavia, risente della posizione del Bollandista Delehaye «il culto determina l’agiografia», pretesto per chiarire la sua idea di agiografia definita «il mezzo ecclesiastico più efficace per alimentare e fare espandere il culto». Secondo Bronzini, nel caso di San Nicola, "in assenza di documentazione storica e di univoca identificazione della persona – la fusione/confusione Nicola di Myra/Nicola di Sion – la sua agiografia leggendaria cresce in rapporto inversamente proporzionale alla sua agiografia storica, dando consistenza reale ad una figura simbolica". In realtà, le risultanze delle ricerche condotte negli ultimi decenni, soprattutto da Gerardo Cioffari , uno dei più importanti studiosi della figura di San Nicola e della diffusione del suo culto nel mondo, hanno restituito consistenza storica alla figura del vescovo di Myra, ricostruendo importanti tasselli della sua storia e dell’origine del suo culto.
San Nicola, Santo della Terra e del Mare, dalla leggenda alla storia
Ada Campione
2025-01-01
Abstract
Bronzini, fascinated by the multifaceted nature of Saint Nicholas and his cult, explores his ability to adapt to culturally diverse and geographically distant contexts, highlighting not only his relationship with the sea—a theme traditionally examined—but also his connection to the land. His analysis, however, is influenced by the position of the Bollandist Delehaye—“the cult determines the hagiography”—a pretext for clarifying his idea of hagiography defined as “the most effective ecclesiastical means of nourishing and expanding the cult.” According to Bronzini, in the case of Saint Nicholas, “in the absence of historical documentation and unambiguous identification of the person—the fusion/confusion of Nicholas of Myra and Nicholas of Sion—his legendary hagiography grows in inverse proportion to his historical hagiography, giving real substance to a symbolic figure.” In reality, the findings of research conducted in recent decades, especially by Gerardo Cioffari, one of the most important scholars of the figure of Saint Nicholas and the spread of his cult throughout the world, have restored historical substance to the figure of the Bishop of Myra, reconstructing important pieces of his history and the origins of his cult.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


