This paper examines the growing divide within the U.S. federal judiciary during the Trump presidency, focusing on the tension between the “militant resistance” of lower federal courts and the increasingly originalist and deferential orientation of the Supreme Court. Through the analysis of key cases—such as the litigation over the “Muslim Ban” and the more recent Trump v. Casa decision— the paper explores how judicial reactions to executive overreach reflected a broader institutional struggle over the limits of presidential power and the balance of the constitutional system

Militant Democracy vs. Originalist Authority: Trump and the Courts

Laura Fabiano
2025-01-01

Abstract

This paper examines the growing divide within the U.S. federal judiciary during the Trump presidency, focusing on the tension between the “militant resistance” of lower federal courts and the increasingly originalist and deferential orientation of the Supreme Court. Through the analysis of key cases—such as the litigation over the “Muslim Ban” and the more recent Trump v. Casa decision— the paper explores how judicial reactions to executive overreach reflected a broader institutional struggle over the limits of presidential power and the balance of the constitutional system
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/561023
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact