We are grateful to all commentators who took the time to read and provide insightful and thought-provoking commentaries on our article on consonance and dissonance perception [1]. The different backgrounds and expertise of the various contributors enriched the discussion by highlighting different issues across several research perspectives. Here, we discuss some of the important theoretical issues and observations raised by Lahdelma and Eerola [2], Parncutt and Schiavio [3], Brandt [4], Proverbio [5], and Bowling [6].

A system sciences approach to consonance/dissonance: From biological constraints to cultural differences: Reply to comments on: "Consonance and dissonance perception. A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses"

Di Stefano, Nicola
;
Brattico, Elvira
2024-01-01

Abstract

We are grateful to all commentators who took the time to read and provide insightful and thought-provoking commentaries on our article on consonance and dissonance perception [1]. The different backgrounds and expertise of the various contributors enriched the discussion by highlighting different issues across several research perspectives. Here, we discuss some of the important theoretical issues and observations raised by Lahdelma and Eerola [2], Parncutt and Schiavio [3], Brandt [4], Proverbio [5], and Bowling [6].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DiStefano24.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: DiStefano24.pdf
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 309.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
309.58 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/523744
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact