This paper aims to investigate the impact of monopoly power on the world of work within the logistics sector, particularly in the context of automation processes. We conduct a fieldwork analysis of three workplaces situated in Italy, each owned by distinct types of monopolies: a conventional monopoly, Phillip Morris, the global leader in tobacco and cigarette production; a state-owned monopoly, Poste Italiane, the exclusive public provider of mail services within the national borders; and anovel form of digital monopoly that holds control over intangibles and exhibits monopsonistic control over labour—Amazon. Through a comparative examination of these three diverse forms of monopolies, utilising corporate-level metrics andpatent data, we scrutinise the impact on the labour process of individuals employed in the logistics sector and affected by the implementation of automationtechnology, such as Automated Guided Vehicles. Employing a qualitative analysis that includes semi-structured interviews with HR professionals, IT specialists, andworkers, we underscore that powerful monopolies play a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of technological development, adoption, and utilisation. Despite notabledistinctions observed among the three cases, we underscore a common trend of standardisation and codification of human activities when interfacing withautomated machines.
Monopoly power upon the world of work: a workplace analysis in the logistic segment under automation
Valeria Cirillo;
2024-01-01
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the impact of monopoly power on the world of work within the logistics sector, particularly in the context of automation processes. We conduct a fieldwork analysis of three workplaces situated in Italy, each owned by distinct types of monopolies: a conventional monopoly, Phillip Morris, the global leader in tobacco and cigarette production; a state-owned monopoly, Poste Italiane, the exclusive public provider of mail services within the national borders; and anovel form of digital monopoly that holds control over intangibles and exhibits monopsonistic control over labour—Amazon. Through a comparative examination of these three diverse forms of monopolies, utilising corporate-level metrics andpatent data, we scrutinise the impact on the labour process of individuals employed in the logistics sector and affected by the implementation of automationtechnology, such as Automated Guided Vehicles. Employing a qualitative analysis that includes semi-structured interviews with HR professionals, IT specialists, andworkers, we underscore that powerful monopolies play a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of technological development, adoption, and utilisation. Despite notabledistinctions observed among the three cases, we underscore a common trend of standardisation and codification of human activities when interfacing withautomated machines.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.