Although considerable scholarly activity has been produced on Asterius of Amasea in the last century, he continues to be considered a minor author, pressed between the great Cappadocians, his contemporaries, and the homonymous Sophist. Judged sometimes a witless emulator, sometimes an epitomizer in perpetual debt to the previous tradition, and while acknowledging him some literary merit, he is deemed to be unequal to his contemporaries for lack of philosophical and theological thought. By tracing an apparently marginal theme such as that of the journey within his works, it is instead possible to demonstrate how Asterius was able to rework traditional themes in an original and coherent perspective. He proves to be a refined author, acquiring nuances and literary volume and he demonstrates indeed an autonomy of thought, departing from the examples of his time, and approaching an idea of humanity closer to that of us contemporaries.
Nonostante negli ultimi decenni la figura di Asterio di Amasea abbia suscitato un discreto interesse tra gli studiosi, egli continua a essere considerato un autore minore, schiacciato tra i grandi Cappadoci, suoi contemporanei, e l'omonimo Sofista. Talvolta giudicato un emulatore privo di ingegno, talvolta un compilatore costantemente debitore alla tradizione precedente, pur riconoscendogli un certo valore letterario, viene ritenuto inferiore ai suoi contemporanei per la mancanza di un pensiero filosofico e teologico profondo. Tuttavia, attraverso l’analisi di un tema apparentemente marginale come quello del viaggio nelle sue opere, è possibile dimostrare come Asterio sia riuscito a rielaborare temi tradizionali con un’originalità e una coerenza sorprendenti. Egli si rivela un autore raffinato, capace di aggiungere sfumature e profondità letteraria, e dimostra, infatti, un’autonomia di pensiero, discostandosi dagli esempi del suo tempo e avvicinandosi a una concezione dell’umanità più vicina alla nostra sensibilità contemporanea.
Natura, viaggio e viandanti nell’opera omiletica di Asterio di Amasea
avellis luca
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2023-01-01
Abstract
Although considerable scholarly activity has been produced on Asterius of Amasea in the last century, he continues to be considered a minor author, pressed between the great Cappadocians, his contemporaries, and the homonymous Sophist. Judged sometimes a witless emulator, sometimes an epitomizer in perpetual debt to the previous tradition, and while acknowledging him some literary merit, he is deemed to be unequal to his contemporaries for lack of philosophical and theological thought. By tracing an apparently marginal theme such as that of the journey within his works, it is instead possible to demonstrate how Asterius was able to rework traditional themes in an original and coherent perspective. He proves to be a refined author, acquiring nuances and literary volume and he demonstrates indeed an autonomy of thought, departing from the examples of his time, and approaching an idea of humanity closer to that of us contemporaries.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.