Aims: Micra-AV pacing system is a leadless pacemaker (LP) implanted in the right ventricle which can provide atrio-ventricular (AV) synchronous pacing. Echocardiographic data assessing left ventricle contractility 24–48 h after Micra AV implantation are lacking. To evaluate via conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), which was the best pacing modality (VVI vs. VDD) able to ensure the most efficient hemodynamic performance assessed by left ventricle ejection fraction (LF-EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Methods and results: We studied nine patients with high degree AV-block, enrolled in our Institution in a range of time of 5 months. All patients had first degree AV block (PQ interval between 160 and 340 ms). They were considered suitable candidates for MICRA-AV implantation according to current guidelines. Both LF-EF and GLS were performed 24–48 h after device implantation by two experienced echocardiographic physicians. The mean age of the population was 79 6 8 years (8 were male, 89%). Risk factors more represented were hypertension and dyslipidaemia. The maximum PQ interval was 256 6 51 ms. VDD pacing modality allows better LV-EF values than those obtained with a VVI stimulation (with a difference that was statistically significant difference, P-value ¼ 0.008). Similarly, we obtained better GLS values during VDD pacing as respect to VVI (P-value ¼ 0.008). Conclusions: Left ventricle ejection fraction and LV-GLS improve early after leadless MICRA-AV implantation during VDD as compared to VVI pacing modality

549 The role of conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography in the evaluation of leadless endocardial pacing with Micra-AV

Bozza, Nicola;Basile, Paolo;Siena, Paola;Santobuono, Vincenzo Ezio;Carella, Maria Cristina;Favale, Stefano;Guaricci, Andrea Igoren
2021-01-01

Abstract

Aims: Micra-AV pacing system is a leadless pacemaker (LP) implanted in the right ventricle which can provide atrio-ventricular (AV) synchronous pacing. Echocardiographic data assessing left ventricle contractility 24–48 h after Micra AV implantation are lacking. To evaluate via conventional echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), which was the best pacing modality (VVI vs. VDD) able to ensure the most efficient hemodynamic performance assessed by left ventricle ejection fraction (LF-EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Methods and results: We studied nine patients with high degree AV-block, enrolled in our Institution in a range of time of 5 months. All patients had first degree AV block (PQ interval between 160 and 340 ms). They were considered suitable candidates for MICRA-AV implantation according to current guidelines. Both LF-EF and GLS were performed 24–48 h after device implantation by two experienced echocardiographic physicians. The mean age of the population was 79 6 8 years (8 were male, 89%). Risk factors more represented were hypertension and dyslipidaemia. The maximum PQ interval was 256 6 51 ms. VDD pacing modality allows better LV-EF values than those obtained with a VVI stimulation (with a difference that was statistically significant difference, P-value ¼ 0.008). Similarly, we obtained better GLS values during VDD pacing as respect to VVI (P-value ¼ 0.008). Conclusions: Left ventricle ejection fraction and LV-GLS improve early after leadless MICRA-AV implantation during VDD as compared to VVI pacing modality
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/474423
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact