First Report of Ceratocystis ficicola Causing Canker and Wilt Disease on Common Fig (Ficus carica) in Italy

: Common fig (Ficus carica L.) in is one of the most important crops in the Mediterranean area. In Italy, it is grown on a total area of 2118 ha. In Apulia (South-eastern Italy), the annual production of fig exceeds 3200 tons annually and together with olive and grapevine, they characterize the Apulian agricultural panorama. In September 2021, symptoms of a vascular wilt disease and, in severe cases, decline tree mortality were observed in Salento area (Apulia). Symptomatic Affected plants showed symptoms of leaf wilt and different stages of disease expression, which begins with leaf chlorosis on shoots, followed by wilting, extensive defoliation and twig dieback. On the main branches andlower part of the trunk and in some cases on lateral branches, bark cracks and cankers were observed and extended wood discoloration was detected in cross sections. In two orchards located in Salice Salentino (Site 1) and Squinzano (Site 2), where disease incidence exceeded 80%, 3-5 wood discs per tree were gathered from affected tissues from two (Site 1) and four (Site 2) trees. Isolations were performed on malt extract agar 2% amended with 0.5 g L-1 streptomycin sulfate. A Ceratocystis species was recovered from all samples trees with high frequencies (83.3%). Two-week-old colonies on potato dextrose agar showed black ascomata with 300-600 µm wide bases and 1100-2250 µm long necks. On the tips of the necks, ascospores (5-6x4-5 µm) exuded in creamy white sticky masses. Endoconidia (5-9x4.5-7 µm) were abundant, cylindrical, aseptate, and produced in chains. Two monoconidial representative strains CRSFA.Cer.033 (Site 1) and CRSFA.Cer.035 (Site 2) were deposited in the DISSPA Di.S.S.P.A. collection of the University of Bari. Species identification was done through sequence analyses of rDNA internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) using ITS5/ITS4 primers (White et al. 1990), elongation factor 1 alpha gene (TEF) using EF1/EF2 (O'Donnell et al. 1998) and RNA polymerase II gene (RPB2) gene using RPB2-5F/FRPB2fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999). Sequences were deposited in NCBI GenBank (accession numbers: OQ329983-OQ335969 (ITS), OQ352265-OQ352266 (TEF), OQ352268-OQ352267 (RPB2)). The sequences of both Apulian isolates were identical. BLAST searches revealed high similarity to the sequences of two isolates of Ceratocystis ficicola Kajitani and Masuya from Japan: ex-type CMW38543 and CMW38544, specifically 98.41% identity matching with KY685076 (ITS), 100% with KY685079 (TEF), and 99.87% with KY685083 and KY685082 (RPB2). Pathogenicity tests were conducted, on six common fig 'Dottato' seedlings by inoculating one year-old twigs with mycelium plugs (Bolboli et al. 2022). Control plants were inoculated with PDA plugs without mycelium. After one month, all inoculated twigs showed symptoms of wilt. Forty days post-inoculation, the bark of inoculated twigs was removed, and longitudinal and transverse sections revealed wood discolorations extending above and below the inoculation point. Ceratocystis ficicola was consistently reisolated from symptomatic tissues and identified as described above, thus fulfilling Koch's postulates. Neither symptoms nor positive isolations were observed in control seedlings. The pathogen was first described in 2011 in Japan (Kajitani and Masuya, 2011) where it currently affects all fig-producing areas. In 2018, it was reported for the first time in the EPPO region in Greece (Tsopelas et al., 2021), and to our knowledge, this is the first report on its detection in Italy. Since February 2022, C. ficicola has been included in the EPPO alert list because of its potential to cause tree mortality and the difficulty of its eradication. Regional national surveys are therefore urgently needed to determine its distribution in the fig growing areas of Italy and limit its spread. References Bolboli, Z., et al. 2022. Mycol. Prog. 21:89. doi: 10.1007/s11557-022-01834-9 Kajitani, Y., and Masuya, H., 2011. Mycoscience 52:349. doi: 10.1007/s10267-011-0116-5 Liu, Y. J., et al. 1999. Mol. Biol. and Evol. 16:1799. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 O'Donnell, K., et al. 1998. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2044 Tsopelas, P., et al. 2021. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 60:337. doi: 10.36253/phyto-12794 White, T. J., et al. 1990. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego. doi: 10.1016/0307-4412(91)90165-5.