Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Our study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in 343 patients with mRCC. We reported significant differences in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival between nivolumab and cabozantinib in specific mRCC subpopulations.Background: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in specific mRCC subpopulations. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 11 centers from Italy, Spain and US. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We collected data from 343 patients with mRCC, 123 (36%) treated with cabozantinib and 220 (64%) with nivolumab. The median OS resulted longer, but not statistically significant, with nivolumab in patients aged , 70 years (21.4 vs. 15.4 months, P = .746), treated with first-line pazopanib (26.8 vs. 11.6 months, P = .450), or with good (470 vs. 15.5 months, P = .285) or intermediate-risk criteria (14.4 vs. 11.0 months, P = .357), while it was longer, but even not statistically significant, for cabozantinib in patients who received previous sunitinib (25.7 vs. 21.7 months, P = .638) or with bone metastases (28.4 vs. 24.4 months, P = .871). The median PFS was significantly longer with cabozantinib in patients with clear cell histology (7.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = .026) and in patients with good risk features (12.3 vs. 5.7 months, P = .022). Conclusions: Nivolumab and cabozantinib resulted active in mRCC patients, showing distinct results when stratified into clinico-pathological features. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Nivolumab VERSUS Cabozantinib as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparison

Porta, Camillo
2022-01-01

Abstract

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Our study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in 343 patients with mRCC. We reported significant differences in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival between nivolumab and cabozantinib in specific mRCC subpopulations.Background: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in specific mRCC subpopulations. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 11 centers from Italy, Spain and US. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We collected data from 343 patients with mRCC, 123 (36%) treated with cabozantinib and 220 (64%) with nivolumab. The median OS resulted longer, but not statistically significant, with nivolumab in patients aged , 70 years (21.4 vs. 15.4 months, P = .746), treated with first-line pazopanib (26.8 vs. 11.6 months, P = .450), or with good (470 vs. 15.5 months, P = .285) or intermediate-risk criteria (14.4 vs. 11.0 months, P = .357), while it was longer, but even not statistically significant, for cabozantinib in patients who received previous sunitinib (25.7 vs. 21.7 months, P = .638) or with bone metastases (28.4 vs. 24.4 months, P = .871). The median PFS was significantly longer with cabozantinib in patients with clear cell histology (7.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = .026) and in patients with good risk features (12.3 vs. 5.7 months, P = .022). Conclusions: Nivolumab and cabozantinib resulted active in mRCC patients, showing distinct results when stratified into clinico-pathological features. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022 Porta.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 3.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.51 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/464346
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact