ObjectivesTo develop an intuitive and generally applicable system for the reporting, assessment, and documentation of ADC to complement standard BI-RADS criteria.MethodsThis was a multicentric, retrospective analysis of 11 independently conducted institutional review board-approved studies from seven institutions performed between 2007 and 2019. Breast Apparent Diffusion coefficient (ADC-B) categories comprised ADC-B0 (ADC non-diagnostic), ADC-B1 (no enhancing lesion), and ADC-B2-5. The latter was defined by plotting ADC versus cumulative malignancy rates. Statistics comprised ANOVA with post hoc testing and ROC analysis. p values <= 0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1625 patients (age: 55.9 years (+/- 13.8)) with 1736 pathologically verified breast lesions were included. The mean ADC (x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) differed significantly between benign (1.45, SD .40) and malignant lesions (.95, SD .39), and between invasive (.92, SD .22) and in situ carcinomas (1.18, SD .30) (p < .001). The following ADC-B categories were identified: ADC-B0-ADC cannot be assessed; ADC-B1-no contrast-enhancing lesion; ADC-B2-ADC >= 1.9 (cumulative malignancy rate < 0.1%); ADC-B3-ADC 1.5 to < 1.9 (0.1-1.7%); ADC-B4-ADC 1.0 to < 1.5 (10-24.5%); and ADC-B5-ADC < 1.0 (> 24.5%). At the latter threshold, a positive predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI 0.94-0.97) for invasive versus non-invasive breast carcinomas was reached.ConclusionsThe breast apparent diffusion coefficient system (ADC-B) provides a simple and widely applicable categorization scheme for assessment, documentation, and reporting of apparent diffusion coefficient values in contrast-enhancing breast lesions on MRI.

Introduction of a breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system (ADC-B) derived from a large multicenter MRI database

Moschetta, Marco;
2023-01-01

Abstract

ObjectivesTo develop an intuitive and generally applicable system for the reporting, assessment, and documentation of ADC to complement standard BI-RADS criteria.MethodsThis was a multicentric, retrospective analysis of 11 independently conducted institutional review board-approved studies from seven institutions performed between 2007 and 2019. Breast Apparent Diffusion coefficient (ADC-B) categories comprised ADC-B0 (ADC non-diagnostic), ADC-B1 (no enhancing lesion), and ADC-B2-5. The latter was defined by plotting ADC versus cumulative malignancy rates. Statistics comprised ANOVA with post hoc testing and ROC analysis. p values <= 0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1625 patients (age: 55.9 years (+/- 13.8)) with 1736 pathologically verified breast lesions were included. The mean ADC (x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) differed significantly between benign (1.45, SD .40) and malignant lesions (.95, SD .39), and between invasive (.92, SD .22) and in situ carcinomas (1.18, SD .30) (p < .001). The following ADC-B categories were identified: ADC-B0-ADC cannot be assessed; ADC-B1-no contrast-enhancing lesion; ADC-B2-ADC >= 1.9 (cumulative malignancy rate < 0.1%); ADC-B3-ADC 1.5 to < 1.9 (0.1-1.7%); ADC-B4-ADC 1.0 to < 1.5 (10-24.5%); and ADC-B5-ADC < 1.0 (> 24.5%). At the latter threshold, a positive predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI 0.94-0.97) for invasive versus non-invasive breast carcinomas was reached.ConclusionsThe breast apparent diffusion coefficient system (ADC-B) provides a simple and widely applicable categorization scheme for assessment, documentation, and reporting of apparent diffusion coefficient values in contrast-enhancing breast lesions on MRI.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s00330-023-09675-0.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/456633
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact