Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are non-material intangible benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, which are indispensable for the well-being of communities and directly influence the quality of life. CES are deeply interconnected to each other and to providing and regulating services, thus influencing everyday life. CES are among the most important values that people associate with nature, but understanding them may be challenging. The definition of CES is both self-evident and elusive, specifically because they consist of the interaction between two dynamic systems: human societies and natural ecosystems. This paper updates the state of the art about CES evaluation methods, underlining the gap between their economic values and their incorporation into planning and decision-making on different scales and in different sectors, and emphasizes their importance in conservation policies and sustainable development programs. This study reviewed 68 articles published between August 2019 and May 2023 from the SCOPUS database, and classified CES assessment into 15 evaluation methods. This review reveals that the choice of CES assessment methodologies has often depended on evaluation purposes. In addition, specific CES classifications are required, since different definitions and unstandardized economic concepts for assigning market values to the CES can lead to conflicting results. The combination of different methods, monetary and non-monetary, can aid better evaluation of CES by focusing on the interaction between different components, and can facilitate the mapping and quantification of social values of ecosystem services. This can help decision-makers to develop sustainable territorial planning and policies.

Cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods and tools for economic evaluation

Romanazzi G. R.;De Boni A.;Ottomano Palmisano G.
;
Cioffi M.;Roma R.
2023-01-01

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are non-material intangible benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, which are indispensable for the well-being of communities and directly influence the quality of life. CES are deeply interconnected to each other and to providing and regulating services, thus influencing everyday life. CES are among the most important values that people associate with nature, but understanding them may be challenging. The definition of CES is both self-evident and elusive, specifically because they consist of the interaction between two dynamic systems: human societies and natural ecosystems. This paper updates the state of the art about CES evaluation methods, underlining the gap between their economic values and their incorporation into planning and decision-making on different scales and in different sectors, and emphasizes their importance in conservation policies and sustainable development programs. This study reviewed 68 articles published between August 2019 and May 2023 from the SCOPUS database, and classified CES assessment into 15 evaluation methods. This review reveals that the choice of CES assessment methodologies has often depended on evaluation purposes. In addition, specific CES classifications are required, since different definitions and unstandardized economic concepts for assigning market values to the CES can lead to conflicting results. The combination of different methods, monetary and non-monetary, can aid better evaluation of CES by focusing on the interaction between different components, and can facilitate the mapping and quantification of social values of ecosystem services. This can help decision-makers to develop sustainable territorial planning and policies.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/452101
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact