Aims: To evaluate the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after revision canal wall down mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration (rCWD). Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated by rCWD for cholesteatoma between 2016 and 2019. A control group including all patients treated by primary canal wall down with mastoid obliteration (pCWD) for cholesteatoma between 2009 and 2014 was used for the comparison of the postoperative QoL, assessed by the COMQ-12. Results: The rCWD and pCWD groups respectively counted 38 and 78 patients with an average follow-up of 30 and 62 months respectively. No significant difference was found in terms of QoL between the two groups. An intra-group analysis among rCWD patients, showed that patients treated by canal wall down (CWD) at the primary surgery had a significantly worse post-revision QoL compared to those initially treated by canal wall up (CWU), specifically in the hearing and balance domains of the questionnaire. Conclusions: Revision mastoid obliteration leads to similar QoL results to those obtained after primary CWD with obliteration. Patients who had undergone a CWD as primary surgery complain worse hearing and balance problems compared to those primarily submitted to CWU, even after revision surgery.
Quality of life after revision mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration
Vito Pontillo;Sabino Ciprelli;Rossella Grillo;Nicola Quaranta
2023-01-01
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after revision canal wall down mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration (rCWD). Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated by rCWD for cholesteatoma between 2016 and 2019. A control group including all patients treated by primary canal wall down with mastoid obliteration (pCWD) for cholesteatoma between 2009 and 2014 was used for the comparison of the postoperative QoL, assessed by the COMQ-12. Results: The rCWD and pCWD groups respectively counted 38 and 78 patients with an average follow-up of 30 and 62 months respectively. No significant difference was found in terms of QoL between the two groups. An intra-group analysis among rCWD patients, showed that patients treated by canal wall down (CWD) at the primary surgery had a significantly worse post-revision QoL compared to those initially treated by canal wall up (CWU), specifically in the hearing and balance domains of the questionnaire. Conclusions: Revision mastoid obliteration leads to similar QoL results to those obtained after primary CWD with obliteration. Patients who had undergone a CWD as primary surgery complain worse hearing and balance problems compared to those primarily submitted to CWU, even after revision surgery.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S2173573523000716-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
302.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
302.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
1-s2.0-S2173573523000716-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
276.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
276.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


