The self-portrait Ovid left to his contemporaries is that of an habitué of the rhetoric schools, a talented pupil of such celebrated rhetoricians as Porcius Latro and Arellius Fuscus. An invaluable evidence is represented by Seneca the Elder’s controversy 2.2, which provides the image of Ovid as a young declaimer : in the excerpts preserved by Seneca at 2.2.9-11, the would-be poet appears while discussing the main topic of the controversy, that is the binding power of lovers’ oaths. The rhetorical training left a trace in Ovid’s poetry, and particularly on his twentieth Heroid, which seems actually structured like a school controversy, for we can find two opposite points of view (Acontius’ and Cydippe’s) confronting each other about the same question ; besides, Acontius underscores the importance of lovers’ oaths, claiming that they are put under gods’ protection. It looks as if Ovid, many years after his rhetorical education, gave an answer to the question put forward by Seneca’s controversy on the same topic.

Les dieux garants du serment d’amour. Ovide déclamateur (Sen. Contr. 2.2) et poète (Ov. Her. 20)

Graziana Brescia
2022-01-01

Abstract

The self-portrait Ovid left to his contemporaries is that of an habitué of the rhetoric schools, a talented pupil of such celebrated rhetoricians as Porcius Latro and Arellius Fuscus. An invaluable evidence is represented by Seneca the Elder’s controversy 2.2, which provides the image of Ovid as a young declaimer : in the excerpts preserved by Seneca at 2.2.9-11, the would-be poet appears while discussing the main topic of the controversy, that is the binding power of lovers’ oaths. The rhetorical training left a trace in Ovid’s poetry, and particularly on his twentieth Heroid, which seems actually structured like a school controversy, for we can find two opposite points of view (Acontius’ and Cydippe’s) confronting each other about the same question ; besides, Acontius underscores the importance of lovers’ oaths, claiming that they are put under gods’ protection. It looks as if Ovid, many years after his rhetorical education, gave an answer to the question put forward by Seneca’s controversy on the same topic.
2022
9782383770725
L’image qu’Ovide a voulu donner à ses contemporains est celle d’un habitué des écoles de rhétorique, élève de rhéteurs célèbres tels que Porcius Latro et Arellius Fuscus. À ce propos, on retrouve un précieux témoignage dans la controversia 2.2 de Sénèque le Rhéteur concernant l’activité du futur poète en qualité de déclamateur. Ovide dans les excerpta mentionnés par Sénèque at 2.2.9-11 se prononce sur la quaestio proposée dans la controversia, c’est-à-dire sur la validité et la force contraignante d’un serment d’amour. L’apprentissage rhétorique semble avoir laissé des traces même dans la poésie ovidienne, où on trouve une intéressante idée métalittéraire. On se réfère notamment à Héroides 20, dont le texte semble, en effet, suivre la structure d’une controversia, soit parce que – comme toutes les Héroides doubles – il fournit une comparaison entre deux points de vue (celui d’Acontius et celui de Cydippe) sur la même quaestio, soit, surtout, parce que dans cette lettre Acontius remarque l’importance du serment d’amour qui est protégé par les dieux. D’une certaine manière, et longtemps après son apprentissage dans les écoles de rhétorique, Ovide semblerait donc avoir donné une solution à la quaestio proposée dans la controversia de Sénèque (contr. 2.2.10) relativement à l’importance attribuée aux serments par les dieux.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/430801
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact