This paper focuses on the study of the "greenium", i.e., the premium on Green Bonds (GBs) vs. Traditional Bonds (TBs) whereby investors accept lower yields of GBs vs. TBs, which is caused by the important difference between them with reference to their contribution to the green transition, specifically paying attention to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on it. The conjecture of this paper is that the negative shock of rates due to the pandemic crisis has increased the greenium, as it has also increased the interest in projects of the green transition. In addition, a hypothesis is made that the risk of breaking the green promises might be higher for corporations than for governments and, hence, that the greenium would be lower for corporate GBs than for government GBs. Finally, the possibility that the post-pandemic changes of the greenium might vary depending on individual GBs' liquidity is considered. The empirical analyses provide support for the first two hypotheses but not for the third one.

The "Greenium" in Green Bonds: How Did It Change with COVID-19?

Intonti, M;Serlenga, L;De Leonardis, M;
2023-01-01

Abstract

This paper focuses on the study of the "greenium", i.e., the premium on Green Bonds (GBs) vs. Traditional Bonds (TBs) whereby investors accept lower yields of GBs vs. TBs, which is caused by the important difference between them with reference to their contribution to the green transition, specifically paying attention to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on it. The conjecture of this paper is that the negative shock of rates due to the pandemic crisis has increased the greenium, as it has also increased the interest in projects of the green transition. In addition, a hypothesis is made that the risk of breaking the green promises might be higher for corporations than for governments and, hence, that the greenium would be lower for corporate GBs than for government GBs. Finally, the possibility that the post-pandemic changes of the greenium might vary depending on individual GBs' liquidity is considered. The empirical analyses provide support for the first two hypotheses but not for the third one.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sustainability-15-05631-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.91 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.91 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/430481
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact