The authority declined in the different historical eras, has always been characterised as a problematic element with which to give life to a scientific-cultural reflection of confrontation between the actors in the family context of the same: the parental figures and the related educational responsibilities. The question, which aims to trace a possible solution, focuses in particular on the crisis of the paternal code triggering a more complex fracture in the authoritative representation of the figure of the father. The demand for authority, although it is the crux of the crisis of the father figure, can be found in the rich bibliography that finds maximum representation in what Pati calls the excess of isms: ‘Authoritarianism is domination, subservience, instrumentalization; it does not lead to independence, to responsibility, to self-government: it demands blind obedience, uncritical adherence, passive acceptance of the dictates of the strongest’ (Pati, 2008, p. 17). True authority, therefore, eschews the excesses, which as such constitutes those -isms to which its alteration is due: authoritarianism and permissiveness.

The adult figure in the path of identity building of the young: the roots of an educational discomfort and the return of his father in education

Vito Balzano
2020-01-01

Abstract

The authority declined in the different historical eras, has always been characterised as a problematic element with which to give life to a scientific-cultural reflection of confrontation between the actors in the family context of the same: the parental figures and the related educational responsibilities. The question, which aims to trace a possible solution, focuses in particular on the crisis of the paternal code triggering a more complex fracture in the authoritative representation of the figure of the father. The demand for authority, although it is the crux of the crisis of the father figure, can be found in the rich bibliography that finds maximum representation in what Pati calls the excess of isms: ‘Authoritarianism is domination, subservience, instrumentalization; it does not lead to independence, to responsibility, to self-government: it demands blind obedience, uncritical adherence, passive acceptance of the dictates of the strongest’ (Pati, 2008, p. 17). True authority, therefore, eschews the excesses, which as such constitutes those -isms to which its alteration is due: authoritarianism and permissiveness.
2020
978-86-80712-40-6
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/419642
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact