Preliminary results from an Italian National Registry on the outcomes of the Najuta fenestrated aortic arch endograft

Introduction: Arch pathology represents one of the last frontiers in aortic aneurysms endovascular management. Several companies recently developed dedicated branched and fenestrated endografts specifically designed for the aortic arch, aiming to overcome some of the issues associated with standard thoracic endograft and supra-aortic vessels extra-anatomical debranching. This study aimed to evaluate early outcomes obtained with a custom-made fenestrated endograft approved for thoracic aortic aneurysms exclusion. Methods: All consecutive patients treated with the Najuta endograft (Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) in Italy were prospectively enrolled and included in the study population. Anatomical characteristics and perioperative data were retrospectively analyzed. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day clinical success, overall survival, supra-aortic vessel patency, endoleak and need for reintervention or surgical conversion. Results: During the period 2018-2022, seventy-six patients received a Najuta endograft in Italy and were enrolled in the study. Median age was 72 (IQR 69-76) years and 80.3% were male. Most of the patients received treatment for atherosclerotic aneurysms (80.3%) while the others for post-dissection aneurysms (7.9%), penetrating aortic ulcer (9.2%), or type I endoleak correction after previous thoracic endovascular repair (2.6%). Overall, 161 supra-aortic vessels were preserved through a dedicated fenestration. Technical success was achieved in 74/76 (97.4%) of procedures; both failures were associated with endoleak detection at final angiography (one type I and one type III endoleak). Two distal migrations occurred during the implanting procedure. Clinical success at 30 days was 94.7%. Two early reinterventions were needed within 30 days after index procedure: in one case an aortic false lumen coils embolization was performed, since distal re-entry caused enlargement of the post dissection thoracic aneurysm. The other procedure consisted of a femoral pseudoaneurysm repair. Median follow-up was 7 (IQR 3-15) months; no supra-aortic vessel occlusions occurred and no patients needed surgical conversion. Conclusion: Early results suggest that in selected patients with aortic arch pathology needing a proximal landing, an endovascular approach with the Najuta system is safe and effective, especially for those at high surgical risk. A strict follow-up with high-quality computed tomography angiography images and eventual long-term complications evaluation is needed to confirm these initial experience findings.