The essay focuses on a significant moment in the process of the legislative unification of the Kingdom of Italy: that of the extension to the Neapolitan provinces of the penal codes and, in particular, of the judicial system set up by Urbano Rattazzi in 1859 for the Kingdom of Sardinia. The choice of a judicial system that stiffened the governmental mechanisms of control of the judiciary, proving to be among the most backward systems in force at the time, contributed to making the question of the judiciary’s independence a crucial constitutional problem in the legal history of the Italian State. At the time, the idea of extending the Piedmontese judicial system to the annexed provinces was dictated in part by the haste to complete unification, and in part by the tendency manifested in Turin to direct it according to a rigid centralism. In the background of this affair, however, the role and responsibility of those southern exiles, mostly talented jurists, who were entrusted with this by the Piedmontese government should not be overlooked. Tenacious supporters of the Savoia’s moralising work in the unitarist mission entrusted to them, they were unable to seize, for various reasons, the opportunity to start a thoughtful and constructive debate on the issue of the independence and autonomy of judges, recovering an important legal tradition, such as that of the south, and involving the best and intellectually honest part of southern society.

La extensión del sistema judicial de Saboya a las provincias napolitanas en la “misión unificadora”

Gaia Masiello
2022-01-01

Abstract

The essay focuses on a significant moment in the process of the legislative unification of the Kingdom of Italy: that of the extension to the Neapolitan provinces of the penal codes and, in particular, of the judicial system set up by Urbano Rattazzi in 1859 for the Kingdom of Sardinia. The choice of a judicial system that stiffened the governmental mechanisms of control of the judiciary, proving to be among the most backward systems in force at the time, contributed to making the question of the judiciary’s independence a crucial constitutional problem in the legal history of the Italian State. At the time, the idea of extending the Piedmontese judicial system to the annexed provinces was dictated in part by the haste to complete unification, and in part by the tendency manifested in Turin to direct it according to a rigid centralism. In the background of this affair, however, the role and responsibility of those southern exiles, mostly talented jurists, who were entrusted with this by the Piedmontese government should not be overlooked. Tenacious supporters of the Savoia’s moralising work in the unitarist mission entrusted to them, they were unable to seize, for various reasons, the opportunity to start a thoughtful and constructive debate on the issue of the independence and autonomy of judges, recovering an important legal tradition, such as that of the south, and involving the best and intellectually honest part of southern society.
2022
El ensayo recorre un momento significativo en el proceso de unificación legislativa del Reino de Italia: el de la extensión a las provincias napolitanas de los códigos penales y, en particular, del sistema judicial preparado por Urbano Rattazzi en 1859 para el Reino de Cerdeña. La opción por un sistema judicial que endureciera los mecanismos gubernamentales de control de la magistratura, mostrándose entre los sistemas más atrasados vigentes en la época, contribuyó a convertir la cuestión de la independencia de la magistratura en la historia del Estado italiano en un nudo constitucional crucial. En aquel momento, la elección de Rattazzi para el sistema judicial estaba dictada en parte por la prisa por completar la unificación, y en parte por la tendencia en Turín a dirigirla según un rígido centralismo. Sin embargo, en el trasfondo de este asunto no hay que pasar por alto el papel y la responsabilidad de aquellos exiliados del sur, en su mayoría juristas de talento, que fueron comisionados por el gobierno piamontés. Tenaces partidarios de la labor moralizadora de Saboya en la misión unitarista que se les encomendó, no supieron aprovechar, por diversas razones, la oportunidad de iniciar un debate reflexivo y constructivo sobre la cuestión de la independencia y la autonomía de los jueces, recuperando una importante tradición jurídica, como es la del sur, e implicando a la mejor e intelectualmente honesta parte de la sociedad sureña.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/414977
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact