Within the non-mainstream growth literature, the neo-Kaleckian model is the only one that presents an endogenous capacity utilization in the long run. After systematising the debate around recent contributions and presenting the baseline, extensions of the neo-Kaleckian model and providing some notes on the normal rate of capacity utilization, I assess critically three recent alternatives that try to justify endogenous utilization in neo-Kaleckian models. All these contributions present different theoretical and empirical shortcomings that should be addressed in order to substantiate their claims.

Critical notes on some recent neo-Kaleckian contributions on capacity utilization

Gahn
2023-01-01

Abstract

Within the non-mainstream growth literature, the neo-Kaleckian model is the only one that presents an endogenous capacity utilization in the long run. After systematising the debate around recent contributions and presenting the baseline, extensions of the neo-Kaleckian model and providing some notes on the normal rate of capacity utilization, I assess critically three recent alternatives that try to justify endogenous utilization in neo-Kaleckian models. All these contributions present different theoretical and empirical shortcomings that should be addressed in order to substantiate their claims.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
anonymous.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 808.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
808.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Gahn Critical notes.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 383.41 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
383.41 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/406955
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact