The microbiota can be defined as the collection of all microbes, bacteria, viruses, and fungi living in a host. Recent evidence suggests that the bacterial microbiota of the human gut plays an important role in the pathogenesis of many diseases by promoting inflammation. Historically, the first structured model for data analysis of the human gut microbiota was proposed in (Holmes et al., 2012). The central idea of this model is that the microbiota of a given individual represents a sample of a bacterial metacommunity, also called enterotype. An enterotype therefore represents a particular composition of the microbiota in terms of the relative abundances of different bacterial species. A similar specification was recently proposed in the unsupervised setting in (Anderlucci & Viroli, 2020). In both cases, the focus is on classification, and it was proposed to marginalize with respect to probability distributions over enterotypes to obtain a class-conditional likelihood that depends only on the specific parameters of each component of the mixture and the latent indicator variable of the metacommunity (enterotype). We review these two models available in the literature to highlight their similarities and differences, also discussing possible future research.

A Brief Review on Compositional Inference of Microbiome Data

Massimo Bilancia
;
Fabio Manca;Gianvito Pio
2021-01-01

Abstract

The microbiota can be defined as the collection of all microbes, bacteria, viruses, and fungi living in a host. Recent evidence suggests that the bacterial microbiota of the human gut plays an important role in the pathogenesis of many diseases by promoting inflammation. Historically, the first structured model for data analysis of the human gut microbiota was proposed in (Holmes et al., 2012). The central idea of this model is that the microbiota of a given individual represents a sample of a bacterial metacommunity, also called enterotype. An enterotype therefore represents a particular composition of the microbiota in terms of the relative abundances of different bacterial species. A similar specification was recently proposed in the unsupervised setting in (Anderlucci & Viroli, 2020). In both cases, the focus is on classification, and it was proposed to marginalize with respect to probability distributions over enterotypes to obtain a class-conditional likelihood that depends only on the specific parameters of each component of the mixture and the latent indicator variable of the metacommunity (enterotype). We review these two models available in the literature to highlight their similarities and differences, also discussing possible future research.
2021
978-88-6629-066-7
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MAS 2021 article.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: capitolo di libro
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 555.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
555.85 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/404550
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact