The essay analyzes the concept of militant democracy starting from the theory of Karl Loewen stein to test the transformations of the concept, which has incorporated different forms of de fense of the Constitution. In fact, starting with the defense against anti-system parties, which banned them from the constitutional order, the notion of defense of democratic principles today includes, on the one hand, the eternity clauses as a limit to the constitutional revi sion and the fundamental rights as a limit to European law, and on the other hand, all those clauses or emergency procedures that make it possible to face unforeseeable events (such as the terrorism and the pandemic crisis) but only in compliance with the principle of legality. In addition, the use of the “self-defense” tools of the Constitution must always be supervised by the organs, the Constitutional Courts, which are constitutionally responsible for the protec tion of democracy, with all its historical background of principles, values and rights. Only in this way we can prevent that militant democracy, originally conceived for the defense of the Constitution, can be transformed into an instrument that weakens it.

Un prisma costituzionale, la protezione della Costituzione: dalla democrazia “militante” all’autodifesa costituzionale

Calamo Specchia M.
2021-01-01

Abstract

The essay analyzes the concept of militant democracy starting from the theory of Karl Loewen stein to test the transformations of the concept, which has incorporated different forms of de fense of the Constitution. In fact, starting with the defense against anti-system parties, which banned them from the constitutional order, the notion of defense of democratic principles today includes, on the one hand, the eternity clauses as a limit to the constitutional revi sion and the fundamental rights as a limit to European law, and on the other hand, all those clauses or emergency procedures that make it possible to face unforeseeable events (such as the terrorism and the pandemic crisis) but only in compliance with the principle of legality. In addition, the use of the “self-defense” tools of the Constitution must always be supervised by the organs, the Constitutional Courts, which are constitutionally responsible for the protec tion of democracy, with all its historical background of principles, values and rights. Only in this way we can prevent that militant democracy, originally conceived for the defense of the Constitution, can be transformed into an instrument that weakens it.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021-DPCE-UN PRISMA COSTITUZIONALE.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 453.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
453.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/400848
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact