Here, we provide the first insights into the transmission dynamics of the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa by the meadow spittlebug Philaenus spumarius, gathered through DC EPG (electrical penetration graph)-assisted transmission tests and comparative observations of the probing and feeding behavior of infective versus non-infective vectors on healthy olive plants. Bacterial cells binding to P. spumarius’ foregut occurred at a very low rate and in a time as short as 15 min spent by the insect in xylem ingestion or activities interspersed with xylem ingestion (interruption during xylem ingestion and resting). P. spumarius inoculation of bacterial cells into the xylem was exclusively associated with an early (ca. 2 to 7 min after the onset of the first probe) and occasional behavior, provisionally termed waveform Xe, presumably related to egestion regulated by pre-cibarial valve fluttering. Infective spittlebugs compared to non-infective ones exhibited: (i) longer non-probing and shorter xylem ingestion; (ii) longer duration of single non-probing events; (iii) fewer sustained ingestions (ingestion longer than 10 min) and interruptions of xylem activity (N); and (iv) longer time required to perform the first probe. These observations suggest difficulties in feeding of infective P. spumarius probably caused by the presence of X. fastidiosa within the foregut. Overall, our data indicate that likely short time—few minutes—is required for X. fastidiosa transmission by P. spumarius; thus, vector control strategies should aim at preventing spittlebug access to the host plant. Furthermore, our findings represent an important contribution for further research on the disruption of spittlebug–bacterium interactions.

Feeding behavior in relation to spittlebug transmission of Xylella fastidiosa

Cornara, Daniele
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Here, we provide the first insights into the transmission dynamics of the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa by the meadow spittlebug Philaenus spumarius, gathered through DC EPG (electrical penetration graph)-assisted transmission tests and comparative observations of the probing and feeding behavior of infective versus non-infective vectors on healthy olive plants. Bacterial cells binding to P. spumarius’ foregut occurred at a very low rate and in a time as short as 15 min spent by the insect in xylem ingestion or activities interspersed with xylem ingestion (interruption during xylem ingestion and resting). P. spumarius inoculation of bacterial cells into the xylem was exclusively associated with an early (ca. 2 to 7 min after the onset of the first probe) and occasional behavior, provisionally termed waveform Xe, presumably related to egestion regulated by pre-cibarial valve fluttering. Infective spittlebugs compared to non-infective ones exhibited: (i) longer non-probing and shorter xylem ingestion; (ii) longer duration of single non-probing events; (iii) fewer sustained ingestions (ingestion longer than 10 min) and interruptions of xylem activity (N); and (iv) longer time required to perform the first probe. These observations suggest difficulties in feeding of infective P. spumarius probably caused by the presence of X. fastidiosa within the foregut. Overall, our data indicate that likely short time—few minutes—is required for X. fastidiosa transmission by P. spumarius; thus, vector control strategies should aim at preventing spittlebug access to the host plant. Furthermore, our findings represent an important contribution for further research on the disruption of spittlebug–bacterium interactions.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cornara 2020 JPS Feeding behavior Philaenus in relation to xylella transmission.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.89 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/387273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact