The paper aims to provide a theoretical advancement in the post-Keynesian debate between horizontalists and structuralists by offering an additional theoretical support to the horizontalist view. Through the newly introduced notion of paradox of illiquidity, a critique to the endogenous money–liquidity preference model is developed, by focusing on the relationship between the volume of loans and the mark-up. The paradox of illiquidity aims to deny: (a) the idea of a banking sector achieving illiquid position during its lending activities and, consequently, (b) the view of an upward sloping credit supply curve.
Post-Keynesian endogenous money theory: Horizontalists, structuralists and the paradox of illiquidity
Deleidi M.
2020-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to provide a theoretical advancement in the post-Keynesian debate between horizontalists and structuralists by offering an additional theoretical support to the horizontalist view. Through the newly introduced notion of paradox of illiquidity, a critique to the endogenous money–liquidity preference model is developed, by focusing on the relationship between the volume of loans and the mark-up. The paradox of illiquidity aims to deny: (a) the idea of a banking sector achieving illiquid position during its lending activities and, consequently, (b) the view of an upward sloping credit supply curve.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
6.MECA_DELEIDI.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.38 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.38 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
