Background: Diferent methods have been used to preserve phlebotomine sand fies for research purposes, including for taxonomic studies and detection of Leishmania spp. Here, we evaluated the efect of various preservation methods at diferent storage times on phlebotomine sand fy DNA concentration and purity. Methods: Field-collected phlebotomine sand fies were individually stored in 70% ethanol (G1) and 95% ethanol (G2) at room temperature, 70% ethanol (G3) and 95% ethanol (G4) at 8 °C or frozen dry (i.e. no preservation solution) at −20 °C (G5). DNA concentration and purity were assessed at various storage times (T1, ≤12 h; T2, 3 months; T3, 6 months; T4, 9 months; and T5, 12 months). Fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and cacophony (CAC) genes of phlebotomine sand fies were also amplifed. Results: Mean DNA concentration (P=0.178) and 260/280 purity ratios (P=0.584) did not vary signifcantly among various preservation methods and storage times. Within each group, DNA concentration varied in G1 (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P=0.009) for T3 vs T4 (Dunn’s post-hoc, P<0.05), and in G2 (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P=0.004) for T1 vs T2 and T1 vs T4 (Dunn’s post-hoc, P<0.05). For 260/280 purity ratios, the only statistically signifcant diference was found for G5 (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P=0.020) between T1 vs T4 (Dunn’s post-hoc test, P<0.05). The cox1 and CAC genes were suc‑ cessfully amplifed, regardless of the preservation method and storage time; except in one sample from G2 at T1, for which the CAC gene failed to amplify. Conclusions: The preservation methods and storage times herein evaluated did not afect the concentration and purity of DNA samples obtained from feld-collected phlebotomine sand fies, for up to 12 months. Furthermore, these preservation methods did not interfere with PCR amplifcation of CAC and cox1 genes, being suitable for molecular analyses under the conditions studied herein.

Evaluation of different storage times and preservation methods on phlebotomine sand fly DNA concentration and purity

Otranto D.;Dantas-Torres Filipe
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background: Diferent methods have been used to preserve phlebotomine sand fies for research purposes, including for taxonomic studies and detection of Leishmania spp. Here, we evaluated the efect of various preservation methods at diferent storage times on phlebotomine sand fy DNA concentration and purity. Methods: Field-collected phlebotomine sand fies were individually stored in 70% ethanol (G1) and 95% ethanol (G2) at room temperature, 70% ethanol (G3) and 95% ethanol (G4) at 8 °C or frozen dry (i.e. no preservation solution) at −20 °C (G5). DNA concentration and purity were assessed at various storage times (T1, ≤12 h; T2, 3 months; T3, 6 months; T4, 9 months; and T5, 12 months). Fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and cacophony (CAC) genes of phlebotomine sand fies were also amplifed. Results: Mean DNA concentration (P=0.178) and 260/280 purity ratios (P=0.584) did not vary signifcantly among various preservation methods and storage times. Within each group, DNA concentration varied in G1 (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P=0.009) for T3 vs T4 (Dunn’s post-hoc, P<0.05), and in G2 (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P=0.004) for T1 vs T2 and T1 vs T4 (Dunn’s post-hoc, P<0.05). For 260/280 purity ratios, the only statistically signifcant diference was found for G5 (Kruskal-Wallis H-test, P=0.020) between T1 vs T4 (Dunn’s post-hoc test, P<0.05). The cox1 and CAC genes were suc‑ cessfully amplifed, regardless of the preservation method and storage time; except in one sample from G2 at T1, for which the CAC gene failed to amplify. Conclusions: The preservation methods and storage times herein evaluated did not afect the concentration and purity of DNA samples obtained from feld-collected phlebotomine sand fies, for up to 12 months. Furthermore, these preservation methods did not interfere with PCR amplifcation of CAC and cox1 genes, being suitable for molecular analyses under the conditions studied herein.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/314087
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact