Objective: To evaluate the effect of 5 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on laryngeal size in spontaneously breathing anesthetized dogs via computed tomography (CT). Design: Prospective, randomized, cross-over clinical study. Setting: University teaching hospital and referral private practice. Animals: Eight healthy client-owned dogs undergoing CT. Interventions: Dogs were sedated with acepromazine 20 μg/kg IM and induced with fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 3–5 mg/kg IV before being maintained on fentanyl (5 μg/kg/h) and propofol (0.3 mg/kg/min) constant rate infusion. Dogs received an air/oxygen mixture with (CPAP) and without (NO-CPAP) 5 cm H2O of CPAP in a random order. Each study step lasted 15 minutes. Measurements and Main Results: Ten minutes after the beginning of each study period, a CT scan of the laryngeal region was obtained at end-expiration. CT images were analyzed to determine the laryngeal cross-sectional area (CSA; cm2), total volume (VTOT; cm3), and laterolateral and dorsoventral diameters (DLL and DDV, respectively; cm). Differences between the 2 treatments were analyzed with t-test for paired data (P < 0.05). Compared to the NO-CPAP, during CPAP the CSA increased by 53.3 ± 23.1% (ie, from 3.3 ± 0.8 to 5.1 ± 1.3 cm2, P = 0.0004), VTOT increased by 52.4 ± 13.6% (from 6.2 ± 1.7 to 9.4 ± 2.4 cm3, P < 0.0001), and DLL and DDV were 55.5 ± 13.3% (3.6 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 0.5 cm, P = 0.006) and 20.3 ± 8.8% larger (3.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.7 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.0002), respectively. Conclusions: Laryngeal volume and cross sectional area increased during the application of 5 cm H2O of helmet CPAP in spontaneously breathing anesthetized dogs.

Evaluation of the effects of helmet continuous positive airway pressure on laryngeal size in dogs anesthetized with propofol and fentanyl using computed tomography

Guarracino A.;Iacobellis P.;Grasso S.;Lacitignola L.;Staffieri F.
2020-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of 5 cm H2O of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on laryngeal size in spontaneously breathing anesthetized dogs via computed tomography (CT). Design: Prospective, randomized, cross-over clinical study. Setting: University teaching hospital and referral private practice. Animals: Eight healthy client-owned dogs undergoing CT. Interventions: Dogs were sedated with acepromazine 20 μg/kg IM and induced with fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 3–5 mg/kg IV before being maintained on fentanyl (5 μg/kg/h) and propofol (0.3 mg/kg/min) constant rate infusion. Dogs received an air/oxygen mixture with (CPAP) and without (NO-CPAP) 5 cm H2O of CPAP in a random order. Each study step lasted 15 minutes. Measurements and Main Results: Ten minutes after the beginning of each study period, a CT scan of the laryngeal region was obtained at end-expiration. CT images were analyzed to determine the laryngeal cross-sectional area (CSA; cm2), total volume (VTOT; cm3), and laterolateral and dorsoventral diameters (DLL and DDV, respectively; cm). Differences between the 2 treatments were analyzed with t-test for paired data (P < 0.05). Compared to the NO-CPAP, during CPAP the CSA increased by 53.3 ± 23.1% (ie, from 3.3 ± 0.8 to 5.1 ± 1.3 cm2, P = 0.0004), VTOT increased by 52.4 ± 13.6% (from 6.2 ± 1.7 to 9.4 ± 2.4 cm3, P < 0.0001), and DLL and DDV were 55.5 ± 13.3% (3.6 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 0.5 cm, P = 0.006) and 20.3 ± 8.8% larger (3.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.7 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.0002), respectively. Conclusions: Laryngeal volume and cross sectional area increased during the application of 5 cm H2O of helmet CPAP in spontaneously breathing anesthetized dogs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/309675
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact