The manuscript Neapol. lat. 2 (ex-Vindob. lat. 16) has undergone a c gical and palaeographic analysis of its different parts (some late antiquity, others early medieval), with special attention to those of the early medieval period wich up to now have seen limited investigation. The research results lead us to believe that the lat. 2 did not assume its current appearance (a kind of “library in a box”) at the beginning of the XVI century, as was traditionally believed, but that between the end of the VII and early VIII century its parts were already physically adjoining, although independent from a textual and material point of view.
Una biblioteca in scatola. Grammatici, e non solo, nel codice Neapol. Lat. 2 (ex Vindob. Lat. 16), in "Bollettino dei Classici", 39-40 (2018-2019), pp. 54-97.
Paolo Fioretti
2018-01-01
Abstract
The manuscript Neapol. lat. 2 (ex-Vindob. lat. 16) has undergone a c gical and palaeographic analysis of its different parts (some late antiquity, others early medieval), with special attention to those of the early medieval period wich up to now have seen limited investigation. The research results lead us to believe that the lat. 2 did not assume its current appearance (a kind of “library in a box”) at the beginning of the XVI century, as was traditionally believed, but that between the end of the VII and early VIII century its parts were already physically adjoining, although independent from a textual and material point of view.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Testo Fioretti Boll. Classici XXXIX-XL.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
4.37 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.37 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.