The Dublin III Regulation, aimed at allocating the responsibility for examining applications for international protection, has proven to be an unfair system because it puts an excessive weight on those Member States more exposed to migratory flows. So far, we have focused on the relocation of asylum-seekers, a measure with some weaknesses that has been op- posed by the Visegrad Group of MS, thus blocking the Dublin system’s reform (that, by the way, is being withdrawn). In this paper, I suggest four alternatives: a free-choice system, an EU humanitarian visa system, the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions, or an amendment of the 2003 Long Term Resident Directive.
La riforma del sistema Dublino: il problema della condivisione delle responsabilità
morgese
2020-01-01
Abstract
The Dublin III Regulation, aimed at allocating the responsibility for examining applications for international protection, has proven to be an unfair system because it puts an excessive weight on those Member States more exposed to migratory flows. So far, we have focused on the relocation of asylum-seekers, a measure with some weaknesses that has been op- posed by the Visegrad Group of MS, thus blocking the Dublin system’s reform (that, by the way, is being withdrawn). In this paper, I suggest four alternatives: a free-choice system, an EU humanitarian visa system, the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions, or an amendment of the 2003 Long Term Resident Directive.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Morgese-DP.pdf
Open Access dal 14/11/2021
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
294.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
294.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.