The aim of this literature review article is to evaluate the new surgical technique “Surgery-First” and compare it with the conventional orthognathic surgery in terms of treatment length, patient satisfaction and post-surgical stability. The goal is to compare the pro and cons of the two techniques and to determine which technique can offer more efficient results.
COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY AND “SURGERY-FIRST” PROTOCOL: A NEW WEAPON AGAINST TIME
A. BALLINI;S. CANTORE;A. M. INCHINGOLO;F. INCHINGOLO;N. CIRULLI
2019-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this literature review article is to evaluate the new surgical technique “Surgery-First” and compare it with the conventional orthognathic surgery in terms of treatment length, patient satisfaction and post-surgical stability. The goal is to compare the pro and cons of the two techniques and to determine which technique can offer more efficient results.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
375.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
375.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
