Background& Aims: C-13-Urea Breath Test (UBT) is a non-invasive, highly accurate and recommended test to detect Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and to confirm post-therapy eradication. However, differences exist in terms of manufacturers, dose of labelled urea, addition of citric acid, solid vs. liquid formulation, and sampling times of breath samples. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of "short" (15 minutes) vs. "standard" (30 minutes) time for a single type of liquid UBT.Methods: We compared the performance of a single UBT type (BREATHQUALITY, AB Analitica, Padua, Italy, 10 mL of 75 mg C-13-Urea and 1.4 g citric acid) during a "short" vs. "standard" breath sampling time. Enrolled were 151 subjects requiring UBT as naive (N=92) or post-eradication (N=59) checks.Results: UBT at 15 and 30 minutes were highly comparable, showing optimal correlation in all subsets of patients (i.e. naive vs. post eradication, negative vs. post eradication check). One discrepant result occurred at the borderline zone of the DOB 4 parts per thousand, but proved to be true positive at a later confirmation by a second UBT and stool antigen test.Conclusions: By shortening the testing time of BREATHQUALITY to 15 minutes (-50%) comparable accuracy will be maintained and in addition, it will bring some benefits to patients' waiting lists, compliance, and hospital staff.

Faster detection of helicobacter pylori infection by 13c-urea breath test. Comparing short versus standard sampling time

Molina-Molina E.;Bonfrate L.;Shanmugam H.;Portincasa P.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background& Aims: C-13-Urea Breath Test (UBT) is a non-invasive, highly accurate and recommended test to detect Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and to confirm post-therapy eradication. However, differences exist in terms of manufacturers, dose of labelled urea, addition of citric acid, solid vs. liquid formulation, and sampling times of breath samples. In this study, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of "short" (15 minutes) vs. "standard" (30 minutes) time for a single type of liquid UBT.Methods: We compared the performance of a single UBT type (BREATHQUALITY, AB Analitica, Padua, Italy, 10 mL of 75 mg C-13-Urea and 1.4 g citric acid) during a "short" vs. "standard" breath sampling time. Enrolled were 151 subjects requiring UBT as naive (N=92) or post-eradication (N=59) checks.Results: UBT at 15 and 30 minutes were highly comparable, showing optimal correlation in all subsets of patients (i.e. naive vs. post eradication, negative vs. post eradication check). One discrepant result occurred at the borderline zone of the DOB 4 parts per thousand, but proved to be true positive at a later confirmation by a second UBT and stool antigen test.Conclusions: By shortening the testing time of BREATHQUALITY to 15 minutes (-50%) comparable accuracy will be maintained and in addition, it will bring some benefits to patients' waiting lists, compliance, and hospital staff.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Portincasa-2019-submitted. UBT 15-30.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 742.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
742.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/249244
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact