The article starts from an analysis of S.P. Huntington’s theory of the clash of civilizations and puts in evidence one of its critical points, i.e. the fact that Huntington does not pay any attention to the development by the EU of a particular kind of actorness through the promotion of interregionalism worldwide. Tracing the history of the different phases of success and decline of both theories, the article attempts to test their persistent explanatory and analytical capacity in relation to current developments in the international arena as well as in the academic context.
Clash of civilizations and interregionalism: rise and fall (and a new dawn?) of two theoretical approaches
Gallotta Giulia Maria
2019-01-01
Abstract
The article starts from an analysis of S.P. Huntington’s theory of the clash of civilizations and puts in evidence one of its critical points, i.e. the fact that Huntington does not pay any attention to the development by the EU of a particular kind of actorness through the promotion of interregionalism worldwide. Tracing the history of the different phases of success and decline of both theories, the article attempts to test their persistent explanatory and analytical capacity in relation to current developments in the international arena as well as in the academic context.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Giulia Maria Gallotta OJH.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
569.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
569.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.