On the basis of the comparison between AP 3.10 and Euripides’ peculiar version of the myth of Hypsipyle, the A. re-examines the last two verses of the epigram and submits a new proposal for restitution of the puzzling and much-disputed v. 5: instead of the inadmissible and incongruous manuscript reading Ἀσώτιδος νέαν κούραν, the A. puts forward Ἀσιάτιδος, Εὔνοε, μοῦσαν, which, unlike the various conjectures offered by other commentators on this passage, fits with the distintive characteristics of the musician Euneus.

Euneo e la ‘musa asiatica’ di Euripide: per una proposta di restituzione dell’epigramma di Cizico AP 3.10

Sabina Castellaneta
2019

Abstract

On the basis of the comparison between AP 3.10 and Euripides’ peculiar version of the myth of Hypsipyle, the A. re-examines the last two verses of the epigram and submits a new proposal for restitution of the puzzling and much-disputed v. 5: instead of the inadmissible and incongruous manuscript reading Ἀσώτιδος νέαν κούραν, the A. puts forward Ἀσιάτιδος, Εὔνοε, μοῦσαν, which, unlike the various conjectures offered by other commentators on this passage, fits with the distintive characteristics of the musician Euneus.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Castellaneta AP 3.10.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.3 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11586/236743
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact