The BCR-ABL1 p190 fusion transcript is the most frequent variant observed in Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Qualitative-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR are the currently used methods to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) in Ph+ ALL patients; for the latter, full standardization and an international quality validation are lacking. Here, we developed a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for MRD monitoring in p190+ ALL cases. The analytical performance was assessed by the limit-of-detection determination, showing a reliability, sensitivity, and precision of the assay of up to 0.001%. Comparison of results obtained with qualitative PCR and ddPCR in 117 follow-up samples from 16 of 26 Ph+ ALL patients showed discordant results in 27% of cases (32 of 117). Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of 19 ddPCR-positive samples with a low tumor burden failed to provide quantitative results in 63% of cases (12 of 19). These results highlight that in p190+ ALL the ddPCR method has a sufficient analytical performance for very low MRD monitoring and for predicting molecular relapse several months before hematologic relapse. In conclusion, MRD monitoring by ddPCR may better stratify Ph+ ALL patients at risk of disease progression.
Droplet Digital PCR Is a Robust Tool for Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in Adult Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Coccaro, Nicoletta;Anelli, Luisa;Zagaria, Antonella;Casieri, Paola;Tota, Giuseppina;Orsini, Paola;Impera, Luciana;Minervini, Angela;Minervini, Crescenzio F;Cumbo, Cosimo;Brunetti, Claudia;Specchia, Giorgina;Albano, Francesco
2018-01-01
Abstract
The BCR-ABL1 p190 fusion transcript is the most frequent variant observed in Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Qualitative-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR are the currently used methods to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) in Ph+ ALL patients; for the latter, full standardization and an international quality validation are lacking. Here, we developed a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for MRD monitoring in p190+ ALL cases. The analytical performance was assessed by the limit-of-detection determination, showing a reliability, sensitivity, and precision of the assay of up to 0.001%. Comparison of results obtained with qualitative PCR and ddPCR in 117 follow-up samples from 16 of 26 Ph+ ALL patients showed discordant results in 27% of cases (32 of 117). Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of 19 ddPCR-positive samples with a low tumor burden failed to provide quantitative results in 63% of cases (12 of 19). These results highlight that in p190+ ALL the ddPCR method has a sufficient analytical performance for very low MRD monitoring and for predicting molecular relapse several months before hematologic relapse. In conclusion, MRD monitoring by ddPCR may better stratify Ph+ ALL patients at risk of disease progression.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Coccaro 2018 2.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
768.12 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
768.12 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Lavoro ddPCR p190.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.