This contribution discusses some legal options aimed at protecting environmental migrants (EMs) within the EU, none of which however proves to be fully satisfactory mainly due to the lack of (at least) a European common legal definition. On the one hand, the legal framework for international protection according to the Qualification Directive has shown to be inadequate, insofar as neither refugee status nor subsidiary protection status are fit for purposes of EMs; also the Temporary Directive and the possibility of adopting temporary non-legislative measures according to Article 78(3) TFUE look like unsatisfactory. On the other hand, humanitarian provisions in the Visa Code, the Schengen Borders Code and the Return Directive are not viable legal instruments because they are non-mandatory for Member States. Furthermore, protection against removal orders according to relevant human rights law applicable in the EU is not a valid solution for all cases. Finally, it should be noted that reset- tlement programmes, humanitarian admission schemes, private sponsorships and protection within Regional Development and Protection Programmes might be use- ful only in specific cases. As a conclusion, we stress the need for a European ad hoc legal instrument dealing with every aspect of the protection of EMs.

Environmental Migrants and the EU Immigration and Asylum Law: Is There any Chance for Protection?

MORGESE
2017-01-01

Abstract

This contribution discusses some legal options aimed at protecting environmental migrants (EMs) within the EU, none of which however proves to be fully satisfactory mainly due to the lack of (at least) a European common legal definition. On the one hand, the legal framework for international protection according to the Qualification Directive has shown to be inadequate, insofar as neither refugee status nor subsidiary protection status are fit for purposes of EMs; also the Temporary Directive and the possibility of adopting temporary non-legislative measures according to Article 78(3) TFUE look like unsatisfactory. On the other hand, humanitarian provisions in the Visa Code, the Schengen Borders Code and the Return Directive are not viable legal instruments because they are non-mandatory for Member States. Furthermore, protection against removal orders according to relevant human rights law applicable in the EU is not a valid solution for all cases. Finally, it should be noted that reset- tlement programmes, humanitarian admission schemes, private sponsorships and protection within Regional Development and Protection Programmes might be use- ful only in specific cases. As a conclusion, we stress the need for a European ad hoc legal instrument dealing with every aspect of the protection of EMs.
2017
978 88 8080 277 8
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Environmental Migrants and the EU Immigration and Asylum Law. Is There any Chance for Protection?.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/207583
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact