The new regulations of banking compensation following the sub prime crisis require that incentive plans must be linked not only to performance parameters, but also to non financial or qualitative metrics related to social value produced by banks. This paper aims to analyze this issue by developing a qualitative rating (ESG remuneration performance rating) to be used not only to investigate the spread and the diversific ation of such qualitative indicators, but also to analyze the best practices by banks. At a methodological level, the content analysis approach is adopted. The sample covers all of the “European globally systemically important institutions” (G-SIIs), while the investigation period regards the three years 2014 2016. The main results are encouraging as they show a good diffusion of qualitative metrics by bank incentive plans; however, the intensive use, synthesized by the “ESG remuneration performance rating” rating”, is still inadequate. Moreover, the analysis reveal other criticalities linked to the implementation of the balance scorecard and the use of measurement tools in order to quantify the qualitative metrics correctly.

Incentive Plans, Pay-for-non-financial Performance and ESG Criteria: Evidence from the European Banking Sector

IANNUZZI, ANTONIA PATRIZIA
2017-01-01

Abstract

The new regulations of banking compensation following the sub prime crisis require that incentive plans must be linked not only to performance parameters, but also to non financial or qualitative metrics related to social value produced by banks. This paper aims to analyze this issue by developing a qualitative rating (ESG remuneration performance rating) to be used not only to investigate the spread and the diversific ation of such qualitative indicators, but also to analyze the best practices by banks. At a methodological level, the content analysis approach is adopted. The sample covers all of the “European globally systemically important institutions” (G-SIIs), while the investigation period regards the three years 2014 2016. The main results are encouraging as they show a good diffusion of qualitative metrics by bank incentive plans; however, the intensive use, synthesized by the “ESG remuneration performance rating” rating”, is still inadequate. Moreover, the analysis reveal other criticalities linked to the implementation of the balance scorecard and the use of measurement tools in order to quantify the qualitative metrics correctly.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
D'Apolito e Iannuzzi (2017), Incentive Plans, Pay for non financial performance and ESG criteria.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 702.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
702.83 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/199579
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact