The essay pursues the investigations started with a previous contribution on the history and content of a few folios (69r -73v ) collected in the miscellaneous Vatican codex Reg. Lat. 1625. The text of the abridged and fragmentary version of the Virgilian Commentary of Servius auctus ad Aen. V-VI is here integrally transcribed, with a series of critical and exegetical adnotations, which make it possible to improve the edition of the so called DS version in several passages. The question of the identification and the chronology of two ancient editors of Vergil – Hebrus (or Ebrius) and Cornelianus – is here re-examined on the basis of two notes by the Reg. ms. and Pomponius Laetus’s Commentary on Virgil.
Il Reg. Lat. 1625 con note al Servius auctus ad Aen. V-VI
LAGIOIA, ALESSANDRO
2016-01-01
Abstract
The essay pursues the investigations started with a previous contribution on the history and content of a few folios (69r -73v ) collected in the miscellaneous Vatican codex Reg. Lat. 1625. The text of the abridged and fragmentary version of the Virgilian Commentary of Servius auctus ad Aen. V-VI is here integrally transcribed, with a series of critical and exegetical adnotations, which make it possible to improve the edition of the so called DS version in several passages. The question of the identification and the chronology of two ancient editors of Vergil – Hebrus (or Ebrius) and Cornelianus – is here re-examined on the basis of two notes by the Reg. ms. and Pomponius Laetus’s Commentary on Virgil.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Invigilata 38 - 2016 Note del Reg. Lat..pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.21 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.21 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
