Abstract View references (31) Erysiphe necator overwinters as mycelium or conidia in dormant buds and/or as cleistothecia, but the importance of the two forms as sources of primary inoculum varies in different viticultural areas. The present study summarizes the observations made over 2001-2003, in 29 vineyards of southern Italy, on the occurrence and frequency of the two overwintering forms. Flag shoots were found in one-third of the vineyards, with a frequency highly variable between year and vineyard, being more frequent in vineyards for wine-grape than for table-grape production. An average of 20% flag shoots were present on the same vine and arm as the previous year, and 75% of them originated from the three proximal buds of the canes. Cleistothecia were found in 46% of monitored vineyards, in the leaves and bark, but not in the soil. In spring there were between 3 and 856 cleistothecia/g of leaf tissue with a viability of 7%, whereas in the bark between 2 and 464 overwintering cleistothecia/g of bark were found, with an average viability of 14%.

Overwintering of Erysiphe necator schw. in southern Italy

MIAZZI, Monica Marilena;
2009-01-01

Abstract

Abstract View references (31) Erysiphe necator overwinters as mycelium or conidia in dormant buds and/or as cleistothecia, but the importance of the two forms as sources of primary inoculum varies in different viticultural areas. The present study summarizes the observations made over 2001-2003, in 29 vineyards of southern Italy, on the occurrence and frequency of the two overwintering forms. Flag shoots were found in one-third of the vineyards, with a frequency highly variable between year and vineyard, being more frequent in vineyards for wine-grape than for table-grape production. An average of 20% flag shoots were present on the same vine and arm as the previous year, and 75% of them originated from the three proximal buds of the canes. Cleistothecia were found in 46% of monitored vineyards, in the leaves and bark, but not in the soil. In spring there were between 3 and 856 cleistothecia/g of leaf tissue with a viability of 7%, whereas in the bark between 2 and 464 overwintering cleistothecia/g of bark were found, with an average viability of 14%.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/192700
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact